Literature DB >> 10827290

Involving the public in rationing decisions. The experience of citizens juries.

J Lenaghan1.   

Abstract

There is growing interest in involving the public in decisions about rationing health care. But who are the public, why should they be involved and how might this be achieved? This paper reviews an innovative new technique for involving the public in healthcare decisions, called citizens' juries. Despite some limitations, the experience of a number of pilots suggest that given enough time and information, the public is willing and able to engage in debates about the allocation of finite resources for health care. As there are no right or wrong answers in health care choices, it is vital that the decision making process has legitimacy, and that the public has an opportunity to be involved.

Keywords:  Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10827290     DOI: 10.1016/s0168-8510(99)00042-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  25 in total

Review 1.  Eliciting reasons: empirical methods in priority setting.

Authors:  Andreas Hasman
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2003-03

Review 2.  Setting Healthcare Priorities at the Macro and Meso Levels: A Framework for Evaluation.

Authors:  Edwine W Barasa; Sassy Molyneux; Mike English; Susan Cleary
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2015-09-16

3.  Public perceptions of ethical issues regarding adult predictive genetic testing.

Authors:  Douglas K Martin; Heather L Greenwood; Jeff Nisker
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2009-03-14

Review 4.  Societal values in the allocation of healthcare resources: is it all about the health gain?

Authors:  Tania Stafinski; Devidas Menon; Deborah Marshall; Timothy Caulfield
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.883

5.  Public engagement in setting priorities in health care.

Authors:  Rebecca A Bruni; Andreas Laupacis; Douglas K Martin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Justice and public participation in universal health coverage: when is tiered coverage unfair and who should decide?

Authors:  Bridget Pratt
Journal:  Asian Bioeth Rev       Date:  2018-11-06

7.  Insurance benefit preferences of the low-income uninsured.

Authors:  Marion Danis; Andrea K Biddle; Susan Dorr Goold
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Assessing the impact of deliberative processes on the views of participants: is it 'in one ear and out the other'?

Authors:  Tania Stafinski; Devidas Menon; Yutaka Yasui
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Including the public in pandemic planning: a deliberative approach.

Authors:  Annette J Braunack-Mayer; Jackie M Street; Wendy A Rogers; Rodney Givney; John R Moss; Janet E Hiller
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  What should be given a priority - costly medications for relatively few people or inexpensive ones for many? The Health Parliament public consultation initiative in Israel.

Authors:  Nurit Guttman; Carmel Shalev; Giora Kaplan; Ahuva Abulafia; Gabi Bin-Nun; Ronen Goffer; Roei Ben-Moshe; Orna Tal; Mordechai Shani; Boaz Lev
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-04-21       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.