Literature DB >> 10826132

Variability of the model-independent AUC: the one sample per individual case.

W Jawień1.   

Abstract

A theory is developed for estimation of a population value of AUC along with its standard deviation, in the case, when only one concentration-time (C-t) sample is available for each individual. This theory is based on model-independent pharmacokinetics. Integration methods are classified due to their applicability to the presented approach. The main goal of this work is to establish a statistical hypothesis-testing procedure which would make single C-t samples usable for bioequivalence studies. An application of the theory to a number of integration methods currently in use is analyzed in detail. A real data illustration is included.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10826132     DOI: 10.1023/a:1020921323001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm        ISSN: 0090-466X


  17 in total

1.  Bias and variance of extrapolated tails for area-under-the-curve (AUC) and area-under-the-moment-curve (AUMC).

Authors:  R D Purves
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1992-10

2.  Estimating integrals using quadrature methods with an application in pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  A J Bailer; W W Piegorsch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Pharmacokinetic evaluation of stable piecewise cubic polynomials as numerical integration functions.

Authors:  K C Yeh; R D Small
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1989-12

4.  Estimation of confidence intervals for area under the curve from destructively obtained pharmacokinetic data.

Authors:  R C Gagnon; J J Peterson
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1998-02

5.  On continuity of integration methods for AUC. A note.

Authors:  W Jawień
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1998-02

6.  Randomization tests for assessing the equality of area under curves for studies using destructive sampling.

Authors:  A J Bailer; S J Ruberg
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.446

7.  The variance of a better AUC estimator for sparse, destructive sampling in toxicokinetics.

Authors:  J R Nedelman; E Gibiansky
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.534

8.  A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability.

Authors:  D J Schuirmann
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1987-12

9.  Testing for the equality of area under the curves when using destructive measurement techniques.

Authors:  A J Bailer
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1988-06

10.  Estimation of variance for AUC in animal studies.

Authors:  J Yuan
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.534

View more
  1 in total

1.  Searching for an optimal AUC estimation method: a never-ending task?

Authors:  Wojciech Jawień
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 2.745

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.