Literature DB >> 10825862

The clinical effectiveness of a dentifrice containing triclosan and a copolymer for controlling breath odor measured organoleptically twelve hours after toothbrushing.

N C Sharma1, H J Galustians, J Qaquish, A Galustians, K N Rustogi, M E Petrone, P Chaknis, L Garcia, A R Volpe, H M Proskin.   

Abstract

The objective of this double-blind clinical study was to investigate the effectiveness of a dentifrice containing triclosan and a copolymer, Colgate Total Toothpaste, for controlling breath odor twelve hours after brushing the teeth compared to a placebo dentifrice which did not contain triclosan or a copolymer. Breath odor was evaluated by a panel of four expert judges using a nine-point hedonic scale. Following a baseline evaluation of breath odor, prospective study subjects who presented scores above the threshold value for unpleasant breath odor were stratified by score, and randomized into two treatment groups. Subjects were provided with a soft-bristled toothbrush, and brushed their teeth thoroughly in their regular and customary manner with their assigned dentifrice. Subjects refrained from dental hygiene, breath mints, or mouth rinses for the next twelve hours, after which they were once again evaluated for breath odor. Sixty-three (63) adult male and female subjects from the Mississauga, Ontario, Canada area participated in the study. At twelve hours after brushing their teeth, subjects in both dentifrice treatment groups presented mean breath odor scores which were statistically significantly lower than the mean scores observed at baseline. However, the difference between the mean twelve-hour breath odor scores differed significantly between the two dentifrices. The mean twelve-hour breath odor score for the Colgate Total Toothpaste group was 4.77, which is within the range of values corresponding to pleasant breath odor; the mean twelve-hour breath odor score for the placebo group was 6.05, which is above the value corresponding to unpleasant breath odor. Thus, the results of this double-blind clinical study support the conclusion that Colgate Total Toothpaste provides effective control of breath odor at twelve hours after brushing the teeth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10825862

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Dent        ISSN: 0895-8831


  9 in total

1.  Evaluation of glycofurol-based gel as a new vehicle for topical application of naproxen.

Authors:  Nahla Salah Barakat
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 3.246

2.  Toxicity studies of poly(anhydride) nanoparticles as carriers for oral drug delivery.

Authors:  Patricia Ojer; Adela López de Cerain; Paloma Areses; Ivan Peñuelas; Juan M Irache
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 3.  Biofilms and the tongue: therapeutical approaches for the control of halitosis.

Authors:  S Roldán; D Herrera; M Sanz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2003-09-26       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Antimicrobial effects of a new therapeutic liquid dentifrice formulation on oral bacteria including odorigenic species.

Authors:  P K Sreenivasan; D Furgang; Y Zhang; W DeVizio; D H Fine
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2004-09-22       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Interventions for managing halitosis.

Authors:  Sumanth Kumbargere Nagraj; Prashanti Eachempati; Eswara Uma; Vijendra Pal Singh; Noorliza Mastura Ismail; Eby Varghese
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-12-11

6.  Comparison of oral malodors before and after nonsurgical periodontal therapy in chronic periodontitis patients.

Authors:  Sao-Shen Liu; Earl Fu; Hsiao-Pei Tu; Min-Wen Fu; Chia-Te Lin; E-Chin Shen
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 2.080

7.  The Effect of Mechanical Tongue Cleaning on Oral Malodor and Tongue Coating.

Authors:  Ha-Na Choi; Young-Sik Cho; Jung-Wan Koo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Pilot study to determine differences in breath odour between cigarette and e-cigarette consumers.

Authors:  Annette Dalrymple; Steven Coburn; Marianne Brandt; George Hardie; James Murphy
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Impact of sleep on the microbiome of oral biofilms.

Authors:  Maki Sotozono; Nanako Kuriki; Yoko Asahi; Yuichiro Noiri; Mikako Hayashi; Daisuke Motooka; Shota Nakamura; Mikiyo Yamaguchi; Tetsuya Iida; Shigeyuki Ebisu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.