Literature DB >> 10825719

On the processing of spatial frequencies as revealed by evoked-potential source modeling.

J L Kenemans1, J M Baas, G R Mangun, M Lijffijt, M N Verbaten.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: Visually evoked potentials (VEPs) are known to be sensitive to spatial frequency, especially in the time range between 50 and 100 ms post-stimulus. In two experiments we localized the cortical activity elicited by stimuli of varying spatial frequency in scalp-recorded brain potentials, using multi-electrode recordings and dipole-source analysis.
RESULTS: Low spatial frequencies (<1 c/d) activated relatively lateral occipital areas, the orientation of the neural ensembles involved being predominantly perpendicular to the scalp surface. In contrast, high spatial frequencies (>4 c/d) induced activation of more medial occipital areas with the predominant orientation of the sources being much more parallel to the scalp surface. Furthermore, at about 100 ms latency the lateral-occipital response to low spatial frequencies was stronger in the right hemisphere; no such asymmetry was found for the responses to the high spatial frequencies. These findings were consistent across varying recording conditions, individual subjects, subject populations, stimulus characteristics (grating orientation, grating vs. checkerboard), and task conditions (active vs. passive).
CONCLUSION: The results indicate that there are differences in sensitivity to specific spatial frequencies between primary and secondary visual areas, as well as between the right and the left hemispheres.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10825719     DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(00)00270-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  16 in total

1.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of feature-based attention spread: evidence from combined electroencephalographic and magnetoencephalographic recordings.

Authors:  Christian Michael Stoppel; Carsten Nicolas Boehler; Hendrik Strumpf; Ruth Marie Krebs; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Jens-Max Hopf; Mircea Ariel Schoenfeld
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  ERPs and eye movements reflect atypical visual perception in pervasive developmental disorder.

Authors:  Chantal Kemner; Herman van Engeland
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2006-01

3.  Hypothesis testing in distributed source models for EEG and MEG data.

Authors:  Lourens J Waldorp; Hilde M Huizenga; Raoul P P P Grasman; Koen B E Böcker; Peter C M Molenaar
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Dissociation of early evoked cortical activity in perceptual grouping.

Authors:  Andrey R Nikolaev; Sergei Gepshtein; Michael Kubovy; Cees van Leeuwen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Effects of spatial frequency on visual evoked magnetic fields.

Authors:  Aki Tsuruhara; Yuko Nagata; Masaya Suzuki; Koji Inui; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-02-16       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Spatial frequency impacts perceptual and attentional ERP components across cultures.

Authors:  Tong Lin; Xin Zhang; Eric C Fields; Robert Sekuler; Angela Gutchess
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  Electrical neuroimaging evidence that spatial frequency-based selective attention affects V1 activity as early as 40-60 ms in humans.

Authors:  Alice M Proverbio; Marzia Del Zotto; Alberto Zani
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 3.288

8.  Effects of alcohol on auditory pre-attentive processing of four sound features: evidence from mismatch negativity.

Authors:  Jinbo He; Bingbing Li; Yongyu Guo; Risto Näätänen; Satu Pakarinen; Yue-Jia Luo
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-08-12       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 9.  Evoked alpha and early access to the knowledge system: the P1 inhibition timing hypothesis.

Authors:  Wolfgang Klimesch
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Gender differences in hemispheric asymmetry for face processing.

Authors:  Alice M Proverbio; Valentina Brignone; Silvia Matarazzo; Marzia Del Zotto; Alberto Zani
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2006-06-08       Impact factor: 3.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.