Literature DB >> 10824344

How accurately do primary health care professionals use cardiovascular risk tables in the management of hypertension?

T J Peters1, A A Montgomery, T Fahey.   

Abstract

It has been suggested that use of cardiovascular risk tables in hypertensive patients might improve clinical management. As part of a randomised controlled trial, we evaluated the accuracy of health professionals' use of the New Zealand risk tables in primary care consultations. Chance-corrected agreement between health professionals' assessments of absolute risk was only moderate (weighted kappa = 0.56 at the 12-month follow-up). Inaccurate use of cardiovascular risk tables may be a barrier to effective implementation of research evidence in the management of hypertension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10824344      PMCID: PMC1313585     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  4 in total

Review 1.  Barriers and bridges to evidence based clinical practice.

Authors:  B Haynes; A Haines
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-07-25

Review 2.  Recommendations from the Canadian Hypertension Society Consensus Conference on the Pharmacologic Treatment of Hypertension.

Authors:  M G Myers; S G Carruthers; F H Leenen; R B Haynes
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1989-05-15       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Management guidelines in essential hypertension: report of the second working party of the British Hypertension Society.

Authors:  P Sever; G Beevers; C Bulpitt; A Lever; L Ramsay; J Reid; J Swales
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-04-10

4.  Sheffield risk and treatment table for cholesterol lowering for primary prevention of coronary heart disease.

Authors:  I U Haq; P R Jackson; W W Yeo; L E Ramsay
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-12-02       Impact factor: 79.321

  4 in total
  3 in total

1.  Comparison of estimates and calculations of risk of coronary heart disease by doctors and nurses using different calculation tools in general practice: cross sectional study.

Authors:  R J McManus; J Mant; C F M Meulendijks; R A Salter; H M Pattison; A K Roalfe; F D R Hobbs
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-02-23

2.  Improving attendance for cardiovascular risk assessment in Australian general practice: an RCT of a monetary incentive for patients.

Authors:  Nigel Stocks; James Allan; Oliver Frank; Sue Williams; Philip Ryan
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 2.497

Review 3.  Systematic review of implementation strategies for risk tables in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases.

Authors:  Ben van Steenkiste; Richard Grol; Trudy van der Weijden
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2008
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.