Literature DB >> 10823649

Radiology on Internet: advice in consulting websites and evaluating their quality.

Y Rolland1, C Bousquet, B Pouliquen, P Le Beux, A Fresnel, R Duvauferrier.   

Abstract

Services offered by Internet are increasing continually and 15,000 medical websites covering all the specialties are available presently. Finding relevant information with a spider-web organization is difficult. We recommend starting with hierarchical lists which propose a selection of sites corresponding to medical specialties. We give our selection of important radiological websites dealing with image databases, case reports, radioanatomy and continuing medical education. While surfing the Web, an evaluation of the quality of websites is necessary. We used quality criteria proposed by Darmoni to rate the quality of ten websites. The global quality is good; help pages and external links are the main noticed shortcomings. All webmasters should pay attention to quality criteria and show visible marks of Darmoni criteria on their home page. To be able to foresee which Internet options should be developed, we evaluated our website and sent a questionnaire to our users. Clinical cases are the most requested facilities; they could be used for continuing medical education.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10823649     DOI: 10.1007/s003300051020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  3 in total

1.  CT colonography: Project of High National Interest No. 2005062137 of the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (MIUR).

Authors:  E Neri; A Laghi; D Regge; P Sacco; T Gallo; F Turini; E Talini; R Ferrari; M Mellaro; M Rengo; S Marchi; D Caramella; C Bartolozzi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 2.  [Internet resources for radiologists : a positive selection].

Authors:  F Miese; C Rubbert; C Buchbender; C Miese; M Quentin; R Lanzman; G Antoch; A Scherer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  [Radiological media and modern supporting tools in radiology].

Authors:  A Sachs; P Pokieser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 0.635

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.