Literature DB >> 10822891

Perceived aesthetic impact of malocclusion and oral self-perceptions in 14-15-year-old Asian and Caucasian children in greater Manchester.

N A Mandall1, J F McCord, A S Blinkhorn, H V Worthington, K D O'Brien.   

Abstract

The aims of this study were to evaluate (i) the effect of ethnicity, social deprivation, and normative orthodontic treatment need on orthodontic aesthetic self-perception, self-perceived need for orthodontic treatment, and oral aesthetic impact of malocclusion; (ii) the effect of ethnicity, social deprivation, and gender on perceived orthodontic treatment need and use of orthodontic services; (iii) the influence of perceived oral aesthetic impact of malocclusion on perceived need and wish for orthodontic treatment; and (iv) whether orthodontic treatment experience influences perceived oral aesthetic impact of malocclusion. A stratified, random sample of 434 14-15-year-old children from schools in Manchester, UK, was obtained. Information was collected on orthodontic aesthetic self-perception and orthodontic treatment experience using a questionnaire. The former data were combined to form an Oral Aesthetic Subjective Impact Scale (OASIS). Normative orthodontic treatment need was measured with the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN). Children with higher clinical need for orthodontic treatment perceived themselves as worse off than their peers with lower need. More socially deprived children or those with high IOTN aesthetic component (AC) scores had a higher (i.e. more negative) aesthetic impact (OASIS) score. Asians and females had higher IOTN dental health component (DHC) scores, but a better aesthetic appearance than Caucasians and males. More deprived children were less likely to have received orthodontic treatment. Despite this, OASIS scores were similar between treated and untreated children. Untreated children who wished for orthodontic treatment had higher IOTN AC and OASIS scores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10822891     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/22.2.175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  29 in total

1.  Frankel 2 appliance versus the Modified Twin Block appliance for Phase 1 treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion in children and adolescents: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Ciara Campbell; Declan Millett; Niamh Kelly; Marie Cooke; Michael Cronin
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Development and validation of the German version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale.

Authors:  Daniel R Reissmann; Andreas W Benecke; Ghazal Aarabi; Ira Sierwald
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Association of overjet and overbite with esthetic impairments of oral health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Ira Sierwald; Mike T John; Oliver Schierz; Paul-Georg Jost-Brinkmann; Daniel R Reissmann
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.938

Review 4.  Dental arch spatial changes after premature loss of first primary molars: a systematic review of controlled studies.

Authors:  Eleftherios G Kaklamanos; Dimitra Lazaridou; Dimitra Tsiantou; Nikolaos Kotsanos; Athanasios E Athanasiou
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 2.634

5.  Factors associated with the desire for orthodontic treatment among Brazilian adolescents and their parents.

Authors:  Leandro S Marques; Isabela A Pordeus; Maria L Ramos-Jorge; Cid A Filogônio; Cintia B Filogônio; Luciano J Pereira; Saul M Paiva
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 2.757

6.  The effect of premature extraction of primary teeth on the subsequent need for orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  N Bhujel; M Duggal; T Munyombwe; J Godson; P Day
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2014-05-17

7.  Perceptions of dental aesthetics of Class III and anterior open bite malocclusions: a comparison between 10- to 11-year-old schoolchildren and orthodontists.

Authors:  Ahmad Mohammad Hamdan; Vinita Singh; William Rock
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Sex differences in esthetic treatment needs in American black and white adolescent orthodontic patients.

Authors:  Edward F Harris
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-05-02       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Malocclusion, dental aesthetic self-perception and quality of life in a 18 to 21 year-old population: a cross section study.

Authors:  Dikson Claudino; Jefferson Traebert
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 2.757

10.  Self-Esteem and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life within a Cleft Lip and/or Palate Population: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Antonia Aleksieva; Giacomo Begnoni; Anna Verdonck; Annouschka Laenen; Guy Willems; Maria Cadenas de Llano-Pérula
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.