Literature DB >> 10822402

Corticospinal function studied over time following incomplete spinal cord injury.

H C Smith1, G Savic, H L Frankel, P H Ellaway, D W Maskill, M A Jamous, N J Davey.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Longitudinal.
OBJECTIVES: (1) To perform standard clinical neurological examinations and establish the pattern of clinical change with time following incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI). (2) To establish the pattern of change in corticospinal electrophysiological function with time after iSCI. (3) To correlate clinical with electrophysiological findings.
SETTING: The National Spinal Injuries Centre, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Aylesbury, UK and Imperial College School of Medicine, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK.
METHODS: Neurological assessments and classification were performed according to American Spinal Injuries Association and International Medical Society of Paraplegia (ASIA/IMSOP) standards. Twenty-one patients (ages 18 - 72 years) with iSCI (level C2 - C7, ASIA impairment grades C - D) and 10 healthy control subjects (ages 27 - 57 years) were studied. Electrophysiological tests of corticospinal function were carried out using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cortex and electromyographic (EMG) recordings from thenar muscles. Both tests were performed on a number of occasions, beginning 19 - 384 days and ending 124 - 1109 days post-injury, and the group data were pooled into time epochs of 50 or 100 days post-injury for analysis. Seven of the patients were studied on seven or more occasions and were also assessed individually.
RESULTS: Individual and pooled data indicated that neurological scores improved progressively and tended to stabilise by around 300 days post-injury. When the patients were first assessed, the mean latency for motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and inhibition of voluntary EMG were significantly different from control values. There was no significant change in latency on subsequent sessions for either the grouped or individual patient data. There was no correlation between clinical assessment and electrophysiological data.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that the weakened inhibition seen following iSCI is established within a few days of the time of spinal cord trauma. We argue that reduced corticospinal inhibition may be a prerequisite for the recovery of useful motor function. SPONSORSHIP: The work was supported by a project grant from The Wellcome Trust.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10822402     DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3100994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  12 in total

1.  The amplitude of lower leg motor evoked potentials is a reliable measure when controlled for torque and motor task.

Authors:  Hubertus J A van Hedel; Christian Murer; Volker Dietz; Armin Curt
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2007-04-13       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Assessment of corticospinal excitability after traumatic spinal cord injury using MEP recruitment curves: a preliminary TMS study.

Authors:  R Nardone; Y Höller; A Thomschewski; A C Bathke; A R Ellis; S M Golaszewski; F Brigo; E Trinka
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 2.772

3.  Understanding cortical topographical changes in liminally contractable muscles in SCI: importance of all mechanisms of neural dysfunction.

Authors:  K A Potter-Baker; Y-L Lin; E B Plow
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  On the way home: a BCI-FES hand therapy self-managed by sub-acute SCI participants and their caregivers: a usability study.

Authors:  Anna Zulauf-Czaja; Manaf K H Al-Taleb; Mariel Purcell; Nina Petric-Gray; Jennifer Cloughley; Aleksandra Vuckovic
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 4.262

5.  Prevalence of spasticity in humans with spinal cord injury with different injury severity.

Authors:  Sina Sangari; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 2.974

6.  Motor neurone excitability in back muscles assessed using mechanically evoked reflexes in spinal cord injured patients.

Authors:  A Kuppuswamy; S Theodorou; M Catley; P H Strutton; P H Ellaway; A H McGregor; N J Davey
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 10.154

7.  Time-Dependent Discrepancies between Assessments of Sensory Function after Incomplete Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Richard A Macklin; Jihye Bae; Melanie Orell; Kim D Anderson; Peter H Ellaway; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 8.  Supraspinal Control Predicts Locomotor Function and Forecasts Responsiveness to Training after Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Edelle C Field-Fote; Jaynie F Yang; D Michele Basso; Monica A Gorassini
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 9.  Corticospinal reorganization after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Martin Oudega; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 10.  Plasticity of corticospinal neural control after locomotor training in human spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Maria Knikou
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 3.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.