OBJECTIVE: Heart rate monitoring has previously been used as a technique for measuring energy expenditure (EE) in field studies. However, the combination of heart rate monitoring with movement sensoring could have theoretical advantages compared to either method used alone. Therefore, this study was undertaken to develop and validate a new combined heart rate monitor and movement sensor instrument (HR+M) for measuring EE. METHODS: The HR+M instrument is a single-piece instrument worn around the chest which records minute-by-minute heart rate and movement. Eight subjects underwent an individual calibration in which EE and heart rate were measured at rest and during a sub-maximal bicycle ergometer test. They then wore the HR+M for 24 hours in a whole-body calorimeter and underwent a standard protocol including periods of physical activity and inactivity. Minute-by-minute heart rate was converted to EE using individual calibration curves with the motion data discriminating between periods of inactivity and activity at low heart rate levels. EE was also calculated using the HRFlex method which relies on heart rate alone. Both estimates of EE were compared to EE measured in the whole-body calorimeter. RESULTS: The mean percentage error of the HR+M method calculating TEE compared with the gold standard of the calorimeter measurement was 0.00% (95% CI of the mean error -0.25, 1. 25). The HRFlex method using the heart rate information alone resulted in a mean percentage error of 16.5% (95% CI of the mean error -0.57, 1.76). CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary test of HR+M demonstrates its ability to estimate EE and the pattern of EE and activity throughout the day. Further validation studies in free-living individuals are necessary. SPONSORSHIP: NJW is an MRC Clinician Scientist Fellow. KLR holds an MRC PhD scholarship.
OBJECTIVE: Heart rate monitoring has previously been used as a technique for measuring energy expenditure (EE) in field studies. However, the combination of heart rate monitoring with movement sensoring could have theoretical advantages compared to either method used alone. Therefore, this study was undertaken to develop and validate a new combined heart rate monitor and movement sensor instrument (HR+M) for measuring EE. METHODS: The HR+M instrument is a single-piece instrument worn around the chest which records minute-by-minute heart rate and movement. Eight subjects underwent an individual calibration in which EE and heart rate were measured at rest and during a sub-maximal bicycle ergometer test. They then wore the HR+M for 24 hours in a whole-body calorimeter and underwent a standard protocol including periods of physical activity and inactivity. Minute-by-minute heart rate was converted to EE using individual calibration curves with the motion data discriminating between periods of inactivity and activity at low heart rate levels. EE was also calculated using the HRFlex method which relies on heart rate alone. Both estimates of EE were compared to EE measured in the whole-body calorimeter. RESULTS: The mean percentage error of the HR+M method calculating TEE compared with the gold standard of the calorimeter measurement was 0.00% (95% CI of the mean error -0.25, 1. 25). The HRFlex method using the heart rate information alone resulted in a mean percentage error of 16.5% (95% CI of the mean error -0.57, 1.76). CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary test of HR+M demonstrates its ability to estimate EE and the pattern of EE and activity throughout the day. Further validation studies in free-living individuals are necessary. SPONSORSHIP: NJW is an MRC Clinician Scientist Fellow. KLR holds an MRC PhD scholarship.
Authors: Nancy F Butte; William W Wong; Anne L Adolph; Maurice R Puyau; Firoz A Vohra; Issa F Zakeri Journal: J Nutr Date: 2010-06-23 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Kate Williams; A Toby Prevost; Simon Griffin; Wendy Hardeman; William Hollingworth; David Spiegelhalter; Stephen Sutton; Ulf Ekelund; Nicholas Wareham; Ann Louise Kinmonth Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2004-10-18 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: A M Silva; D A Santos; C N Matias; P B Júdice; J P Magalhães; U Ekelund; L B Sardinha Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2014-04-02 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Andrew J Atkin; Trish Gorely; Stacy A Clemes; Thomas Yates; Charlotte Edwardson; Soren Brage; Jo Salmon; Simon J Marshall; Stuart J H Biddle Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Søren Brage; Kate Westgate; Paul W Franks; Oliver Stegle; Antony Wright; Ulf Ekelund; Nicholas J Wareham Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-09-08 Impact factor: 3.240