Literature DB >> 10822122

Design of the multicenter Australian study of epidural anesthesia and analgesia in major surgery: the MASTER trial.

J R Rigg1, K Jamrozik, P S Myles, B Silbert, P Peyton, R W Parsons, K Collins.   

Abstract

The Multicenter Australian Study of Epidural Anesthesia and Analgesia in Major Surgery (The MASTER Trial) was designed to evaluate the possible benefit of epidural block in improving outcome in high-risk patients. The trial began in 1995 and is scheduled to reach the planned sample size of 900 during 2001. This paper describes the trial design and presents data comparing 455 patients randomized in 21 institutions in Australia, Hong Kong, and Malaysia, with 237 patients from the same hospitals who were eligible but not randomized. Nine categories of high-risk patients were defined as entry criteria for the trial. Protocols for ethical review, informed consent, randomization, clinical anesthesia and analgesia, and perioperative management were determined following extensive consultation with anesthesiologists throughout Australia. Clinical and research information was collected in participating hospitals by research staff who may not have been blind to allocation. Decisions about the presence or absence of endpoints were made primarily by a computer algorithm, supplemented by blinded clinical experts. Without unblinding the trial, comparison of eligibility criteria and incidence of endpoints between randomized and nonrandomized patients showed only small differences. We conclude that there is no strong evidence of important demographic or clinical differences between randomized and nonrandomized patients eligible for the MASTER Trial. Thus, the trial results are likely to be broadly generalizable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10822122     DOI: 10.1016/s0197-2456(00)00045-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Control Clin Trials        ISSN: 0197-2456


  7 in total

Review 1.  Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials.

Authors:  A Rodgers; N Walker; S Schug; A McKee; H Kehlet; A van Zundert; D Sage; M Futter; G Saville; T Clark; S MacMahon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-12-16

Review 2.  Outcomes for patients with the same disease treated inside and outside of randomized trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Natasha Fernandes; Dianne Bryant; Lauren Griffith; Mohamed El-Rabbany; Nisha M Fernandes; Crystal Kean; Jacquelyn Marsh; Siddhi Mathur; Rebecca Moyer; Clare J Reade; John J Riva; Lyndsay Somerville; Neera Bhatnagar
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Systematic review to determine whether participation in a trial influences outcome.

Authors:  Gunn Elisabeth Vist; Kåre Birger Hagen; P J Devereaux; Dianne Bryant; Doris Tove Kristoffersen; Andrew David Oxman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-05-21

Review 4.  [Cardioprotection by thoracic epidural anesthesia? : meta-analysis].

Authors:  A Gauss; S K Jahn; L H J Eberhart; W Stahl; M Rockemann; M Georgieff; F Wagner; R Meierhenrich
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 5.  Epidural pain relief versus systemic opioid-based pain relief for abdominal aortic surgery.

Authors:  Joanne Guay; Sandra Kopp
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-01-05

Review 6.  Epidural local anaesthetics versus opioid-based analgesic regimens for postoperative gastrointestinal paralysis, vomiting and pain after abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Joanne Guay; Mina Nishimori; Sandra Kopp
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-07-16

Review 7.  Outcomes of patients who participate in randomized controlled trials compared to similar patients receiving similar interventions who do not participate.

Authors:  Gunn Elisabeth Vist; Dianne Bryant; Lyndsay Somerville; Trevor Birminghem; Andrew D Oxman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-07-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.