Literature DB >> 10822040

Formulation substitution and other pharmacokinetic variability: underappreciated variables affecting antiarrhythmic efficacy and safety in clinical practice.

J A Reiffel1.   

Abstract

The process of treating a patient with an antiarrhythmic drug only begins when a physician chooses the drug to be employed. In the given patient, not only must the drug be chosen, but so must the dose, the formulation, and the method of follow-up. Choosing the proper dose requires an understanding of clinical trial efficacy and safety data for the agent chosen in a population of patients resembling the individual to be treated. It also requires a detailed understanding of pharmacologic principles of drug kinetics (e.g., absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion) that might affect the dose needed for the specific patient. The physician must be familiar with subsequent changes in clinical circumstances that might indicate a need for a change in dose or drug. Many circumstances determining drug pharmacokinetics are not under the immediate control of physicians, such as genetic patterns, organ function, and disease circumstances. One, however, is-or should always be-the selection of the drug formulation used. Although generic versions of innovator drugs exist for many agents and often are clinically acceptable, most physicians are unaware of the meager degree of testing that is necessary for the release of a generic drug, and the wide range of attained serum levels that are called bioequivalent by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) when one formulation is compared with another. In patients with cardiac arrhythmias, arrhythmia recurrence, proarrhythmia, and death have been reported in association with antiarrhythmic drug formulation substitution. Despite their reported bioequivalence, the generic agents involved were clearly not therapeutically equivalent. Accordingly, this article was written to educate physicians further about the above-noted important pharmacokinetic variables that can affect a patient's outcome when an antiarrhythmic drug is employed, and to provide information on the generic drug approval process and guidelines for the use of formulation substitution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10822040     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(00)00906-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  10 in total

1.  Generic Substitution Issues: Brand-generic Substitution, Generic-generic Substitution, and Generic Substitution of Narrow Therapeutic Index (NTI)/Critical Dose Drugs.

Authors:  Marian Sorin Paveliu; Simona Bengea; Fraga Silvia Paveliu
Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)       Date:  2011-01

2.  Does the FDA Owe Us an Explanation?

Authors:  James A Reiffel
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2015-10-31

Review 3.  Clinical equivalence of generic and brand-name drugs used in cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Aaron S Kesselheim; Alexander S Misono; Joy L Lee; Margaret R Stedman; M Alan Brookhart; Niteesh K Choudhry; William H Shrank
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Lipoic acid attenuates inflammation via cAMP and protein kinase A signaling.

Authors:  Sonemany Salinthone; Vijayshree Yadav; Robynn V Schillace; Dennis N Bourdette; Daniel W Carr
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Have sanctioned algorithms replaced empiric judgment in the selection process of antiarrhythmic drugs for the therapy for atrial fibrillation?

Authors:  James A Reiffel
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  Recurrence of atrial fibrillation after switching from brand to generic atenolol.

Authors:  Luca Gallelli; Francesca Maida; Orietta Staltari; Pierandrea Rende; Emilio Russo; Benedetto Caroleo; Giovambattista De Sarro
Journal:  J Pharmacol Pharmacother       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

Review 7.  Narrow therapeutic index drugs: a clinical pharmacological consideration to flecainide.

Authors:  Juan Tamargo; Jean-Yves Le Heuzey; Phillipe Mabo
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  "Appropriate Treatment" and Therapeutic Window in Spasticity Treatment with IncobotulinumtoxinA: From 100 to 1000 Units.

Authors:  Giancarlo Ianieri; Riccardo Marvulli; Giulia Alessia Gallo; Pietro Fiore; Marisa Megna
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 4.546

Review 9.  A review of the differences and similarities between generic drugs and their originator counterparts, including economic benefits associated with usage of generic medicines, using Ireland as a case study.

Authors:  Suzanne Dunne; Bill Shannon; Colum Dunne; Walter Cullen
Journal:  BMC Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 2.483

10.  Safety and efficacy of generic drugs with respect to brand formulation.

Authors:  Luca Gallelli; Caterina Palleria; Antonio De Vuono; Laura Mumoli; Piero Vasapollo; Brunella Piro; Emilio Russo
Journal:  J Pharmacol Pharmacother       Date:  2013-12
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.