Literature DB >> 10821213

Alternative reinforcers differentially modify cocaine self-administration by humans.

C L Hart1, M Haney, R W Foltin, M W Fischman.   

Abstract

Six experienced cocaine smokers (two men, four women) participated in an inpatient study to compare self-administration of smoked cocaine when either a $5 money or merchandise voucher was available as an alternative reinforcer. A six-trial choice procedure was used, with sessions consisting of (1) one sample trial, where participants received the cocaine dose and the alternative reinforcer available that day, and (2) five choice trials, where participants chose between the available cocaine dose and the alternative reinforcer. There were eight sessions: in separate sessions, each dose of cocaine (0, 12, 25, 50 mg) was paired with a money voucher and with a merchandise voucher. The choice to self-administer cocaine significantly increased with escalating cocaine doses, and significantly less cocaine was self-administered when money vouchers were available as compared to merchandise vouchers. These data demonstrate that money vouchers are a more effective alternative reinforcer than merchandise vouchers in cocaine abusers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10821213     DOI: 10.1097/00008877-200002000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Pharmacol        ISSN: 0955-8810            Impact factor:   2.293


  49 in total

1.  Contingency management in cocaine abusers: a dose-effect comparison of goods-based versus cash-based incentives.

Authors:  Ryan Vandrey; George E Bigelow; Maxine L Stitzer
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.157

2.  Development of translational preclinical models in substance abuse: Effects of cocaine administration on cocaine choice in humans and non-human primates.

Authors:  Richard W Foltin; Margaret Haney; Eric Rubin; Stephanie C Reed; Nehal Vadhan; Rebecca Balter; Suzette M Evans
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.533

3.  Lorcaserin maintenance fails to attenuate heroin vs. food choice in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  E Andrew Townsend; S Stevens Negus; Justin L Poklis; Matthew L Banks
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 4.492

4.  Alternative reinforcer response cost impacts cocaine choice in humans.

Authors:  William W Stoops; Joshua A Lile; Paul E A Glaser; Lon R Hays; Craig R Rush
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 5.067

Review 5.  Modeling cocaine relapse in rodents: Behavioral considerations and circuit mechanisms.

Authors:  Mitchell R Farrell; Hannah Schoch; Stephen V Mahler
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 5.067

6.  Use of Preclinical Drug vs. Food Choice Procedures to Evaluate Candidate Medications for Cocaine Addiction.

Authors:  Matthew L Banks; Blake A Hutsell; Kathryn L Schwienteck; S Stevens Negus
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Psychiatry       Date:  2015-06

7.  Using a novel alternative to drug choice in a human laboratory model of a cocaine binge: a game of chance.

Authors:  Suzanne K Vosburg; Margaret Haney; Eric Rubin; Richard W Foltin
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 4.492

8.  Effects of a non-drug reinforcer, saccharin, on oral self-administration of phencyclidine in male and female rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Kelly P Cosgrove; Marilyn E Carroll
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Alcohol family history moderates the association between evening substance-free reinforcement and alcohol problems.

Authors:  Keanan J Joyner; Samuel F Acuff; Lidia Z Meshesha; Christopher J Patrick; James G Murphy
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 3.157

10.  Evidence for habitual and goal-directed behavior following devaluation of cocaine: a multifaceted interpretation of relapse.

Authors:  David H Root; Anthony T Fabbricatore; David J Barker; Sisi Ma; Anthony P Pawlak; Mark O West
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.