Literature DB >> 10821192

Focalism: a source of durability bias in affective forecasting.

T D Wilson1, T Wheatley, J M Meyers, D T Gilbert, D Axsom.   

Abstract

The durability bias, the tendency to overpredict the duration of affective reactions to future events, may be due in part to focalism, whereby people focus too much on the event in question and not enough on the consequences of other future events. If so, asking people to think about other future activities should reduce the durability bias. In Studies 1-3, college football fans were less likely to overpredict how long the outcome of a football game would influence their happiness if they first thought about how much time they would spend on other future activities. Studies 4 and 5 ruled out alternative explanations and found evidence for a distraction interpretation, that people who think about future events moderate their forecasts because they believe that these events will reduce thinking about the focal event. The authors discuss the implications of focalism for other literatures, such as the planning fallacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10821192     DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.78.5.821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  40 in total

1.  Should a medical/surgical specialist with formal training in bioethics provide health care ethics consultation in his/her own area of speciality?

Authors:  Mark Bernstein; Kerry Bowman
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2003-09

Review 2.  Older and wiser? An affective science perspective on age-related challenges in financial decision making.

Authors:  Mariann R Weierich; Elizabeth A Kensinger; Alicia H Munnell; Steven A Sass; Brad C Dickerson; Christopher I Wright; Lisa Feldman Barrett
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Affective forecasting and medication decision making in breast-cancer prevention.

Authors:  Michael Hoerger; Laura D Scherer; Angela Fagerlin
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 4.267

Review 4.  Why the brain talks to itself: sources of error in emotional prediction.

Authors:  Daniel T Gilbert; Timothy D Wilson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  More intense experiences, less intense forecasts: why people overweight probability specifications in affective forecasts.

Authors:  Eva C Buechel; Jiao Zhang; Carey K Morewedge; Joachim Vosgerau
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2013-10-14

6.  Highly accurate prediction of emotions surrounding the attacks of September 11, 2001 over 1-, 2-, and 7-year prediction intervals.

Authors:  Bruce P Doré; Robert Meksin; Mara Mather; William Hirst; Kevin N Ochsner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2016-04-21

7.  Temporal and social comparative self-assessments of physical health in young, middle-aged, and young-old adults in the MIDUS study.

Authors:  Jerry Suls; Rebecca A Ferrer; William M P Klein
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2021-03-08

8.  Whose quality of life? A commentary exploring discrepancies between health state evaluations of patients and the general public.

Authors:  Peter A Ubel; George Loewenstein; Christopher Jepson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Compersion: When Jealousy-Inducing Situations Don't (Just) Induce Jealousy.

Authors:  Rhonda N Balzarini; James N McDonald; Taylor Kohut; Justin J Lehmiller; Bjarne M Holmes; Jennifer J Harman
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-05-26

Review 10.  Affective forecasting: an unrecognized challenge in making serious health decisions.

Authors:  Jodi Halpern; Robert M Arnold
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.