OBJECTIVE: To establish the prevalence of urinary incontinence in non-institutionalized Dutch women and determine the consequences of urinary incontinence for their quality of life. DESIGN: Cross sectional questionnaire survey. METHOD: A random sample of 1905 women aged 45-70 years of the population of Zeist, the Netherlands, were sent a questionnaire. Generic quality of life was measured with the RAND-36 and disease specific quality of life was measured with a Dutch translation of the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI) and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ). Based on the answers to the questionnaire four groups of women were formed: no incontinence, only stress, only urge or a combination of stress and urge incontinence. These 4 groups were compared as to questionnaire scores. RESULTS: A total of 1086 questionnaires could be analysed. The prevalence of urinary incontinence was 57.1%: 28.7% stress incontinence, 5.6% urge incontinence and 22.7% both. Of those who reported urinary incontinence 6% were severely inconvenienced by it. Women with urinary incontinence reported a decrease in physical functioning and vitality as compared with women without incontinence (RAND-36). Especially women with urge or a combination of stress and urge incontinence had more severe impairment of their quality of life as compared to women with only stress incontinence. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of urinary incontinence is higher than it is usually reported. Especially the urge component affects the quality of life in a negative way.
OBJECTIVE: To establish the prevalence of urinary incontinence in non-institutionalized Dutch women and determine the consequences of urinary incontinence for their quality of life. DESIGN: Cross sectional questionnaire survey. METHOD: A random sample of 1905 women aged 45-70 years of the population of Zeist, the Netherlands, were sent a questionnaire. Generic quality of life was measured with the RAND-36 and disease specific quality of life was measured with a Dutch translation of the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI) and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ). Based on the answers to the questionnaire four groups of women were formed: no incontinence, only stress, only urge or a combination of stress and urge incontinence. These 4 groups were compared as to questionnaire scores. RESULTS: A total of 1086 questionnaires could be analysed. The prevalence of urinary incontinence was 57.1%: 28.7% stress incontinence, 5.6% urge incontinence and 22.7% both. Of those who reported urinary incontinence 6% were severely inconvenienced by it. Women with urinary incontinence reported a decrease in physical functioning and vitality as compared with women without incontinence (RAND-36). Especially women with urge or a combination of stress and urge incontinence had more severe impairment of their quality of life as compared to women with only stress incontinence. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of urinary incontinence is higher than it is usually reported. Especially the urge component affects the quality of life in a negative way.
Authors: Adri T Apeldoorn; Raymond W Ostelo; Hans van Helvoirt; Julie M Fritz; Henrika C W de Vet; Maurits W van Tulder Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2010-03-26 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Clara Woldringh; Mary van den Wijngaart; Pytha Albers-Heitner; August A B Lycklama à Nijeholt; Toine Lagro-Janssen Journal: Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct Date: 2006-08-26
Authors: Jaap Stoker; Elena Rociu; J L H Ruud Bosch; Embert J Messelink; Victor P M van der Hulst; Annette G Groenendijk; Marinus J C Eijkemans; Johan S Laméris Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2003-04-12 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Marijke C Ph Slieker-ten Hove; Annelies L Pool-Goudzwaard; Marinus J C Eijkemans; Regine P M Steegers-Theunissen; Curt W Burger; Mark E Vierhout Journal: Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct Date: 2009-05-15
Authors: Marijke C Ph Slieker-ten Hove; Annelies L Pool-Goudzwaard; Marinus J C Eijkemans; Regine P M Steegers-Theunissen; Curt W Burger; Mark E Vierhout Journal: Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct Date: 2009-05-15
Authors: Pytha Albers-Heitner; Bary Berghmans; Manuela Joore; Toine Lagro-Janssen; Johan Severens; Fred Nieman; Ron Winkens Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2008-04-15 Impact factor: 2.655