Literature DB >> 10820177

Low intraindividual variability of cyclosporin A exposure reduces chronic rejection incidence and health care costs.

Barry D Kahan1, Maria Welsh1, Diana L Urbauer2, Melinda B Mosheim1, Kathleen M Beusterien3, Martha R Wood3, Linda P Schoenberg1, Joseph Dicesare4, Stephen M Katz1, Charles T VAN Buren1.   

Abstract

The present study applied a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to assess the role of intraindividual variability of cyclosporin A (CsA) drug exposure in predisposing renal transplant recipients to the occurrence of chronic rejection, as well as to increased health care costs using a resource-based economic analysis. Two hundred and four adult renal transplant recipients were treated with tapering doses of prednisone (Pred) and with a concentration-controlled strategy that selected doses of the olive oil-based formulations of CsA (Sandimmune(R)) that achieved target concentrations based on serial pharmacokinetic profiles. The ROC analysis revealed an inflection point of plots of the coefficient of variation (%CV) of CsA exposure versus the risk of chronic rejection at >/=28.4% for the average concentration (C(av)), i.e., the dosing interval-corrected area under the concentration-time curves, and >/=36% for the trough concentration (C(0)). The incidence of chronic rejection over a period of 5 yr was 24% among the less variable (LV) versus 40% among the variable (V) cohort. The economic analysis revealed that the total mean facility and physician costs per patient were $48,789 versus $60,998, respectively (P < 0.01). The degree of variability displayed by any individual could only be predicted by serial measurements of CsA concentrations, and not by demographic features, laboratory determinations, clinical characteristics, individual or mean values of any observed CsA concentration, or other pharmacokinetic parameters calculated following a single drug exposure. Thus, strategies that reduce intrapatient variability of CsA exposure over time may lead to reductions in chronic allograft loss and in treatment costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10820177     DOI: 10.1681/ASN.V1161122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1046-6673            Impact factor:   10.121


  17 in total

Review 1.  Optimizing medication adherence: an ongoing opportunity to improve outcomes after kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Mary B Prendergast; Robert S Gaston
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 2.  Immunosuppression and allograft rejection following lung transplantation: evidence to date.

Authors:  Gregory I Snell; Glen P Westall; Miranda A Paraskeva
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Tacrolimus trough and dose intra-patient variability and CYP3A5 genotype: Effects on acute rejection and graft failure in European American and African American kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  Stephan R Seibert; David P Schladt; Baolin Wu; Weihua Guan; Casey Dorr; Rory P Remmel; Arthur J Matas; Roslyn B Mannon; Ajay K Israni; William S Oetting; Pamala A Jacobson
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 2.863

Review 4.  Kidney Fibrosis: Origins and Interventions.

Authors:  Thomas Vanhove; Roel Goldschmeding; Dirk Kuypers
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Quantification of the Immunosuppressant Tacrolimus on Dried Blood Spots Using LC-MS/MS.

Authors:  Touraj Shokati; Nicholas Bodenberger; Holly Gadpaille; Björn Schniedewind; Alexander A Vinks; Wenlei Jiang; Rita R Alloway; Uwe Christians
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-11-08       Impact factor: 1.355

6.  Renal association clinical practice guideline in post-operative care in the kidney transplant recipient.

Authors:  Richard J Baker; Patrick B Mark; Rajan K Patel; Kate K Stevens; Nicholas Palmer
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 2.388

7.  A randomized pharmacokinetic study of generic tacrolimus versus reference tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  R R Alloway; B Sadaka; J Trofe-Clark; A Wiland; R D Bloom
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  Quantifying the impact of nonadherence patterns on exposure to oral immunosuppressants.

Authors:  J Ross Maclean; Marc Pfister; Zexun Zhou; Amit Roy; Vickie A Tuomari; Michael Heifets
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 2.423

9.  Prospective Measures of Adherence by Questionnaire, Low Immunosuppression and Graft Outcome in Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  Mathilde Prezelin-Reydit; Valérie Dubois; Sophie Caillard; Anne Parissiadis; Isabelle Etienne; Françoise Hau; Laetitia Albano; Monique Pourtein; Benoît Barrou; Jean-Luc Taupin; Christophe Mariat; Léna Absi; Cécile Vigneau; Virginie Renac; Gwendaline Guidicelli; Jonathan Visentin; Pierre Merville; Olivier Thaunat; Lionel Couzi
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Impact of transplantation on neutrophil extracellular trap formation in patients with end-stage renal disease: A single-center, prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Citlalin Vega-Roman; Caridad Leal-Cortes; Eliseo Portilla-de Buen; Benjamín Gomez-Navarro; Zesergio Melo; Adriana Franco-Acevedo; Miguel Medina-Perez; Basilio Jalomo-Martinez; Petra Martinez-Martinez; Luis Alberto Evangelista-Carrillo; Jose Ignacio Cerrillos-Gutierrez; Jorge Andrade-Sierra; Juan J Nieves; Isis Gone-Vazquez; Araceli Escobedo-Ruiz; Luis Felipe Jave-Suarez; Sonia Luquin; Raquel Echavarria
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.