Literature DB >> 10819833

Postpartum depression: a comparison of screening and routine clinical evaluation.

G G Evins1, J P Theofrastous, S L Galvin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the efficacy of routine clinical evaluation with that of screening with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale for the detection of postpartum depression in a residency training program practice. STUDY
DESIGN: Three hundred ninety-one patients during a period of 1 year were assigned according to delivery date to screening for postpartum depression with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale or to a control group who had only spontaneous detection during routine clinical evaluation. The incidences of postpartum depression detection and demographic characteristics were compared between 79 patients in the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale group and 96 patients in the clinical evaluation group by means of chi(2) analyses.
RESULTS: The incidence of postpartum depression detection with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale was significantly higher than the incidence of spontaneous detection during routine clinical evaluation (35.4% and 6.3%, respectively; P =.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale is an effective adjunct to clinical interview for diagnosis of postpartum depression and should be considered in residency training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10819833     DOI: 10.1067/mob.2000.105409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  42 in total

1.  Racial and ethnic disparities in postpartum depression care among low-income women.

Authors:  Katy Backes Kozhimannil; Connie Mah Trinacty; Alisa B Busch; Haiden A Huskamp; Alyce S Adams
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.084

2.  Disseminating perinatal depression screening as a public health initiative: a train-the-trainer approach.

Authors:  Lisa S Segre; Rebecca L Brock; Michael W O'Hara; Laura L Gorman; Jane Engeldinger
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2011-08

3.  Antenatal depression case finding by community health workers in South Africa: feasibility of a mobile phone application.

Authors:  Alexander C Tsai; Mark Tomlinson; Sarah Dewing; Ingrid M le Roux; Jessica M Harwood; Mickey Chopra; Mary Jane Rotheram-Borus
Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health       Date:  2014-03-30       Impact factor: 3.633

4.  Identifying Depression in a National Sample of Caregivers Investigated in Regard to Their Child's Welfare.

Authors:  Emmeline Chuang; Rebecca Wells; Gregory A Aarons
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  New Jersey's efforts to improve postpartum depression care did not change treatment patterns for women on medicaid.

Authors:  Katy Backes Kozhimannil; Alyce S Adams; Stephen B Soumerai; Alisa B Busch; Haiden A Huskamp
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Hospital-Based Care Associated with Postpartum Depression.

Authors:  Avis L Chan; Nan Guo; Rita Popat; Thalia Robakis; Yair Y Blumenfeld; Elliott Main; Karen A Scott; Alexander J Butwick
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2020-05-30

7.  What Is Being Measured? A Comparison of Two Depressive Symptom Severity Instruments with a Depression Diagnosis in Low-Income High-Risk Mothers.

Authors:  Jenny Yang; Maria Martinez; Todd A Schwartz; Linda Beeber
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 8.  Psychiatric consultation to the postpartum mother.

Authors:  Eleanor A Anderson; Deborah R Kim
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.285

9.  Detection of postpartum depression and anxiety in a large health plan.

Authors:  Ashley O Coates; Catherine A Schaefer; Jeanne L Alexander
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2004 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.505

10.  Unintended pregnancy and postpartum depression among first-time mothers.

Authors:  Shahed Abbasi; Cynthia H Chuang; Rada Dagher; Junjia Zhu; Kristen Kjerulff
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 2.681

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.