Literature DB >> 10819372

Prognostic significance of immunohistochemically localized biomarkers in stage II and stage III breast cancer: a multivariate analysis.

J M Bhatavdekar1, D D Patel, N G Shah, H H Vora, T P Suthar, P R Chikhlikar, N Ghosh, T I Trivedi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim was to investigate the expression of a panel of biomarkers such as prolactin (PRL), p53, Bcl-2, c-erb B2, Ki-67, CD44, and factor VIII-related antigen (FVIII-RA) in primary tumors of stage II and stage III breast cancer and its correlation with disease prognostication.
METHODS: The streptavidin-biotin peroxidase complex technique was used for the detection of these antigens. Cytoplasmic staining pattern was observed for PRL, Bcl-2, and Ki-67. Staining pattern for p53 was nuclear. Membranous and/or cytoplasmic staining was noted for c-erb B2 and CD44. Microvessel staining was noted for FVIII-RA.
RESULTS: Of the 93 primary breast tumors analyzed, positivity for PRL was noted in 82%, for p53 in 56%, for Bcl-2 in 73%, for c-erb B2 in 68%, and for Ki-67 and CD44 in 78% each. The microvessel count (MVC) for FVIII-RA ranged from 0.0 to 29.0, with a median of 6.0, which was used as a cutoff. MVC > or = 6.0 was noted in 51% of breast tumors. With increasing tumor size, the higher frequency of positivity of MVC > or = 6.0 (P = .0001), CD44 (P = .001), PRL (P = .002), and c-erb B2 (P = .008), and higher frequency of Bcl-2 negativity (P = .033), was noted. In stage III patients, a higher positivity of the following biomarkers was noted, compared with stage II patients: MVC > or = 6.0 (P = .0004), PRL (P = .0002), c-erb B2 (P = .001), and CD44 (P = .005). Further, Bcl-2 positivity was significantly lower in patients with stage III disease compared with those with stage II disease (P = .024). In patients with nodal involvement, the frequency of c-erb B2 (P = .006), MVC > or = 6.0 (P = .011), and PRL (P = .032) was higher than in those without nodal involvement. Moreover, in these patients, with the increase in the number of involved lymph nodes, there was a significant increase in frequency of CD44+ (P = .0004) and PRL+ (P = .013) tumors. Abnormal expression of one biomarker was seen in 7% of tumors, of two biomarkers in 4%, of three in 15%, of four in 19%, of five in 28%, of six in 20%, and of all seven biomarkers in 7% of tumors. The frequency of an increasing number of biomarkers coexpressed was higher in stage III patients compared with stage II patients (P = .00003). In the total number of patients (n = 93), tumors with Bcl-2 negativity (P = .00001), MVC > or = 6.0 (P = .001), PRL positivity (P = .02), and CD44 positivity (P = .034) had a significantly poorer overall survival (OS) compared with their respective counterparts. In stage II patients (n = 40), only p53 expression was significantly associated with reduced relapse-free survival (P = .009) and OS (P = .040). In multivariate analysis, p53 expression was an independent prognostic factor that influenced relapse-free survival (P = .034) of stage II breast cancer patients. However, it failed to attain statistical significance for OS. In stage III patients (n = 53), tumors with Bcl-2 negativity (P = .0005) and MVC > or = 6.0 (P = .039) had a significantly poorer OS compared with their respective counterparts. In multivariate analysis of stage III patients, Bcl-2 was the only independent prognostic factor (P = .001) for predicting OS. There was a significant association between coexpression of the biomarkers and OS (P = .001). The OS rates decreased with the increase in number of abnormally expressed biomarkers.
CONCLUSIONS: p53 expression in primary tumors was an independent prognostic factor that influenced relapse-free survival in patients with stage II disease. In stage III patients, lack of Bcl-2 expression was independently associated with a poor prognosis and, thus, may be an indicator of aggressive phenotype.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10819372     DOI: 10.1007/s10434-000-0305-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  16 in total

1.  Correlation of ER, PR and HER-2/Neu with other Prognostic Factors in Infiltrating Ductal Carcinoma of Breast.

Authors:  Sepideh Siadati; Majid Sharbatdaran; Novin Nikbakhsh; Naser Ghaemian
Journal:  Iran J Pathol       Date:  2015

Review 2.  Unexploited therapies in breast and prostate cancer: blockade of the prolactin receptor.

Authors:  Eric M Jacobson; Eric R Hugo; Traci R Tuttle; Ruben Papoian; Nira Ben-Jonathan
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 12.015

3.  Histopathology and Prognostic Indices of Carcinoma Breast with Special Reference to p53 Marker.

Authors:  Rajesh Kanna Nandagopal Radha; Viswanathan P; Krishnaswamy B
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-07-20

4.  Prolactin cooperates with loss of p53 to promote claudin-low mammary carcinomas.

Authors:  K A O'Leary; D E Rugowski; R Sullivan; L A Schuler
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 9.867

5.  Co-expression of survivin, c-erbB2, and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2): prognostic value and survival of endometrial cancer patients.

Authors:  Maria Lambropoulou; Nikolaos Papadopoulos; Grigoris Tripsianis; George Alexiadis; Olga Pagonopoulou; Anastasia Kiziridou; Vassilios Liberis; Stylianos Kakolyris; Ekaterini Chatzaki
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  Prolactin activates ERα in the absence of ligand in female mammary development and carcinogenesis in vivo.

Authors:  Kathleen A O'Leary; Fatou Jallow; Debra E Rugowski; Ruth Sullivan; Kerstin W Sinkevicius; Geoffrey L Greene; Linda A Schuler
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 4.736

Review 7.  Prolactin and breast cancer etiology: an epidemiologic perspective.

Authors:  Shelley S Tworoger; Susan E Hankinson
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 2.673

8.  Significance of Her-2/neu protein over expression in Indian breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Vikash Kumar; Mallika Tewari; Usha Singh; H S Shukla
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 0.656

9.  Prolactin-induced mouse mammary carcinomas model estrogen resistant luminal breast cancer.

Authors:  Lisa M Arendt; Debra E Rugowski; Tara A Grafwallner-Huseth; Maria Jose Garcia-Barchino; Hallgeir Rui; Linda A Schuler
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  The Pit-1/Pou1f1 transcription factor regulates and correlates with prolactin expression in human breast cell lines and tumors.

Authors:  I Ben-Batalla; S Seoane; M Macia; T Garcia-Caballero; L O Gonzalez; F Vizoso; R Perez-Fernandez
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 5.678

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.