Literature DB >> 10818378

Nurse practitioners and the Ottawa Ankle Rules: comparisons with medical staff in requesting X-rays for ankle injured patients.

J Allerston1, D Justham.   

Abstract

This paper reports on part of a study of 354 consecutive attendances to an Accident and Emergency (A&E) department by patients with ankle injuries. The aim of this study was to examine the percentage of X-ray photographs requested by nurse practitioners compared to those requested by medical practitioners. The study took place in an A&E department where nurse practitioners have the authority to request X-rays photographs for ankle injuries, either at triage assessment or at the subsequent treatment stage. Nurse practitioners applied the Ottawa Ankle Rules (OAR) in 187 patients. The results show that nurse practitioners requested X-rays for 61.5% of patients assessed using the OAR. This is compared with 80.4% for patients assessed by medical practitioners. The difference is highly significant. Detection rates show that fractures were identified in 29.6% of patients sent for X-ray by nurse practitioners compared with 22.8% in patients seen by medical practitioners, although this difference is not significant. Although nurse practitioners applied the OAR appropriately in all 187 cases, four patients who were assessed by nurse practitioners and judged not to need an X-ray photograph were subsequently found to have a fracture. Copyright 2000 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10818378     DOI: 10.1054/aaen.2000.0103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Accid Emerg Nurs        ISSN: 0965-2302


  5 in total

1.  Mapping the range and scope of emergency nurse practitioner services in the Northern and Yorkshire Region: a telephone survey.

Authors:  S Marr; K Steele; V Swallow; S Craggs; S Procter; J Newton; B Sen; A McNabb
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  [The Ottawa ankle guidelines: analysis of their validity as clinical decision guidelines in the indication of X-rays for ankle and/or middle-foot injuries].

Authors:  P Garcés; S Gurucharri; C Ibiricu; M Izuel; J Mozo; P Buil; J Díez
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2001-06-30       Impact factor: 1.137

Review 3.  Accuracy of Ottawa ankle rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and mid-foot: systematic review.

Authors:  Lucas M Bachmann; Esther Kolb; Michael T Koller; Johann Steurer; Gerben ter Riet
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-02-22

4.  CORR Synthesis: What Triage Recommendations Are Available for Emergent or Urgent Musculoskeletal Conditions?

Authors:  Chloe C Dlott; Daniel H Wiznia
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 4.755

5.  A randomised trial comparing the clinical effectiveness of different emergency department healthcare professionals in soft tissue injury management.

Authors:  Carey Middleton McClellan; Fiona Cramp; Jane Powell; Jonathan Richard Benger
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.