Literature DB >> 10817875

Screening for gestational diabetes: variation in guidelines.

N Vogel1, B Burnand, Y Vial, J Ruiz, F Paccaud, P Hohlfeld.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare published guidelines concerning screening for gestational diabetes. STUDY
DESIGN: Systematic search and comparative analysis of published guidelines. Appraisal of guidelines quality. Simulation analysis.
RESULTS: Ten published guidelines proposed either universal screening (5), selective screening (3) or screening when clinically indicated (2). Variations of testing schedules and blood glucose thresholds were observed. The quality of the published guidelines was low, on average 22 (8-51) percentage points on the assessment scale. These differences would have led to large variations in the number of patients to be screened.
CONCLUSIONS: Large variations between guidelines have been observed which would translate in large practice variations, if the guidelines were systematically applied. These variations are partially explained by the absence of definite evidence that universal or selective screening for gestational diabetes do more good than harm on infant and maternal health. The methodology of developing guidelines should be more evidence based, systematic and explicit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10817875     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-2115(99)00248-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  3 in total

Review 1.  Differences among international pharyngitis guidelines: not just academic.

Authors:  Jan Matthys; Marc De Meyere; Mieke L van Driel; An De Sutter
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

2.  Clinical practice guidelines: towards better quality guidelines and increased international collaboration.

Authors:  R Grol; F A Cluzeau; J S Burgers
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 7.640

3.  Quality of guidelines on the management of diabetes in pregnancy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marjolein J E Greuter; Nathalie M A van Emmerik; Maurice G A J Wouters; Maurits W van Tulder
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 3.007

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.