Literature DB >> 10817872

A retrospective comparison of water births and conventional vaginal deliveries.

C M Otigbah1, M K Dhanjal, G Harmsworth, T Chard.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to document the practice of water births and compare their outcome and safety with normal vaginal deliveries. A retrospective case-control study was conducted over a five year period from 1989 to 1994 at the Maternity Unit, Rochford Hospital, Southend, UK. Three hundred and one women electing for water births were compared with the same number of age and parity matched low risk women having conventional vaginal deliveries. Length of labour; analgesia requirements; apgar scores; maternal complications including perineal trauma, postpartum haemorrhages, infections; fetal and neonatal complications including shoulder dystocias; admissions to the Special Care Baby Unit, and infections were noted. Primigravidae having water births had shorter first and second stages of labour compared with controls (P<0.05 and P<0.005 respectively), reducing the total time spent in labour by 90 min (95% confidence interval 31 to 148). All women having water births had reduced analgesia requirements. No analgesia was required by 38% (95% confidence interval 23.5 to 36.3, P<0.0001) and 1.3% requested opiates compared to 56% of the controls (95% confidence interval 46. 3 to 58.1, P<0.0001). Primigravidae having water births had less perineal trauma (P<0.05). Overall the episiotomy rate was 5 times greater in the control group (95% confidence interval 15 to 26.2, P<0.0001), but more women having water births had perineal tears (95% confidence interval 6.6 to 22.6, P<0.001). There were twice as many third degree tears, post partum haemorrhages and admissions to the Special Care Baby Unit in the controls, although these differences were not significant. Apgar scores were comparable in both groups. There were no neonatal infections or neonatal deaths in the study. This study suffers from many of the methodological problems inherent in investigation of uncommon modes of delivery. However, we conclude that water births in low risk women delivered by experienced professionals are as safe as normal vaginal deliveries. Labouring and delivering in water is associated with a reduction in length of labour and perineal trauma for primigravidae, and a reduction in analgesia requirements for all women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10817872     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-2115(99)00238-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  17 in total

1.  Birth, bath, and beyond: the science and safety of water immersion during labor and birth.

Authors:  Barbara Harper
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2014

Review 2.  Perineal techniques during the second stage of labour for reducing perineal trauma.

Authors:  Vigdis Aasheim; Anne Britt Vika Nilsen; Liv Merete Reinar; Mirjam Lukasse
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-06-13

3.  Predictors of obstetric anal sphincter injury during waterbirth: a secondary analysis of a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Ethel Burns; Laura Price; Jane Carpenter; Lesley Smith
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-12-07       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Does water birth affect the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury? Development of a prognostic model.

Authors:  Helen Louise Preston; Zarko Alfirevic; Gillian Elizabeth Fowler; Steven Lane
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 5.  Immersion in water in labour and birth.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Cluett; Ethel Burns
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-04-15

6.  Randomised controlled trial of labouring in water compared with standard of augmentation for management of dystocia in first stage of labour.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Cluett; Ruth M Pickering; Kathryn Getliffe; Nigel James St George Saunders
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-01-26

7.  The effects of immersion in water on labor, birth and newborn and comparison with epidural analgesia and conventional vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Leyla Mollamahmutoğlu; Ozlem Moraloğlu; Sebnem Ozyer; Filiz Akın Su; Rana Karayalçın; Necati Hançerlioğlu; Ozlem Uzunlar; Uğur Dilmen
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2012-03-01

Review 8.  Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Leanne Jones; Mohammad Othman; Therese Dowswell; Zarko Alfirevic; Simon Gates; Mary Newburn; Susan Jordan; Tina Lavender; James P Neilson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-03-14

9.  A Comparison of Mothers' Quality of Life after Normal Vaginal, Cesarean, and Water Birth Deliveries.

Authors:  Zahra Kavosi; Ali Keshtkaran; Fatemeh Setoodehzadeh; Maryam Kasraeian; Mohammad Khammarnia; Marzieh Eslahi
Journal:  Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery       Date:  2015-07

Review 10.  Immersion in water during labour and birth.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Cluett; Ethel Burns; Anna Cuthbert
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.