Literature DB >> 10817479

Surveillance for adverse events associated with anthrax vaccination--U.S. Department of Defense, 1998-2000.

.   

Abstract

Concerns about the potential use of anthrax as a biologic weapon prompted the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) to announce on December 15, 1997, anthrax vaccination of all U.S. military personnel. This effort is coordinated by the Anthrax Vaccine Immunization Program (AVIP). AVIP plans a phased vaccination process to achieve total force protection against anthrax by 2004. The current phase of implementation includes vaccination of all service members and mission-essential DoD civilian employees assigned or deployed to high-threat areas. On the basis of program monitoring, as of April 12, 2000, 425,976 service members had received 1,620,793 doses of anthrax vaccine adsorbed (AVA) (Bioport, Inc., Lansing, Michigan). Some service members have cited concerns about vaccine safety and efficacy in their decision to refuse vaccination, despite the possibility of administrative or disciplinary actions. To assess anthrax vaccination safety, DoD has conducted surveys of vaccinated personnel. This report describes three completed or ongoing surveys. The findings indicate that rates of local reactions were higher in women than men and that no patterns of unexpected local or systemic adverse events have been identified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10817479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep        ISSN: 0149-2195            Impact factor:   17.586


  8 in total

1.  Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Bacillus anthracis: comparison of results obtained by using the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards broth microdilution reference and Etest agar gradient diffusion methods.

Authors:  M Jasmine Mohammed; Chung K Marston; Tanja Popovic; Robbin S Weyant; Fred C Tenover
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  The Anthrax Vaccine Program: an analysis of the CDC's recommendations for vaccine use.

Authors:  Meryl Nass
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Cost-effectiveness comparison of response strategies to a large-scale anthrax attack on the chicago metropolitan area: impact of timing and surge capacity.

Authors:  Demetrios N Kyriacou; Debra Dobrez; Jorge P Parada; Justin M Steinberg; Adam Kahn; Charles L Bennett; Brian P Schmitt
Journal:  Biosecur Bioterror       Date:  2012-07-30

4.  Unique Inflammatory Mediators and Specific IgE Levels Distinguish Local from Systemic Reactions after Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed Vaccination.

Authors:  Lori Garman; Kenneth Smith; Emily E Muns; Cathy A Velte; Christina E Spooner; Melissa E Munroe; A Darise Farris; Michael R Nelson; Renata J M Engler; Judith A James
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2016-08-05

5.  The UCSD Statin Study: a randomized controlled trial assessing the impact of statins on selected noncardiac outcomes.

Authors:  Beatrice A Golomb; Michael H Criqui; Halbert L White; Joel E Dimsdale
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2004-04

Review 6.  Anthrax vaccines.

Authors:  Miroslav Splino; Jiri Patocka; Roman Prymula; Roman Chlibek
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.526

7.  Complement C3d conjugation to anthrax protective antigen promotes a rapid, sustained, and protective antibody response.

Authors:  Ravi V Kolla; Suresh Chintalapati; Mojgan Sabet; Eugenio Santelli; Robert C Liddington; Michael David; Joshua Fierer; Donald Guiney; Robert C Rickert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Biological terrorism.

Authors:  Gregory J Moran; David A Talan; Fredrick M Abrahamian
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.982

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.