Literature DB >> 10817352

Prognostic relevance of cerbB2 expression following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients in a randomised trial of neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy.

R K Gregory1, T J Powles, J Salter, J C Chang, S Ashley, M Dowsett.   

Abstract

Recent advances in the detection and treatment of breast cancer have led to an intensive search for new markers of both prognosis and chemoresponsiveness. The oncogene cerbB2 has proved to be one of the most promising markers currently under study, both as a predictor of chemoresponsiveness and as a marker of poor prognosis. In addition the increasing use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy has led to the loss of standard prognostic criteria. In order to study the potential role of cerbB2 expression as an indicator of chemoendocrine resistance and poor prognosis, both before and after chemotherapy, we obtained tumour sections from 283 women enrolled onto a neoadjuvant trial. In this trial patients were randomised to receive either primary surgery followed by adjuvant chemoendocrine treatment or neoadjuvant chemoendocrine therapy followed by surgery. CerbB2 status was determined immunohistochemically on all of these patients. Thirty-eight percent of the tumours were cerbB2 positive. There was no significant difference in expression between the adjuvant (41%) and neoadjuvant arms (35%). CerbB2 positive patients were much more likely to have shown non-response to chemoendocrine therapy (p < 0.001) and had a worse DES (p < 0.05). The best prognosis was seen in cerbB2 negative patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoendocrine therapy who showed a significantly better DFS (p < 0.05), than the cerbB2 negative patients receiving adjuvant therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10817352     DOI: 10.1023/a:1006394317282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  6 in total

1.  Analysis of factors affecting endocrine therapy resistance in breast cancer.

Authors:  Min Zhang; Hui Chen; Jun Gu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 2.967

2.  HER-2/Neu overexpression does not predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy or prognosticate survival in patients with locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Asma M Tulbah; Ezzeldin M Ibrahim; Adnan A Ezzat; Dahish S Ajarim; Mohammed M Rahal; Amr N El Weshi; Ralph Sorbris
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Evaluation of ER, PgR, HER-2 and Ki-67 as predictors of response to neoadjuvant anthracycline chemotherapy for operable breast cancer.

Authors:  R J Burcombe; A Makris; P I Richman; F M Daley; S Noble; M Pittam; D Wright; S A Allen; J Dove; G D Wilson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-01-17       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  DNA copy number aberrations in breast cancer by array comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Jian Li; Kai Wang; Shengting Li; Vera Timmermans-Wielenga; Fritz Rank; Carsten Wiuf; Xiuqing Zhang; Huanming Yang; Lars Bolund
Journal:  Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 7.691

5.  Factors that predict early treatment failure for patients with locally advanced (T4) breast cancer.

Authors:  E Montagna; V Bagnardi; N Rotmensz; J Rodriguez; P Veronesi; A Luini; M Intra; E Scarano; A Cardillo; R Torrisi; G Viale; A Goldhirsch; M Colleoni
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Clinical significance of Akt and HER2/neu overexpression in African-American and Latina women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Yanyuan Wu; Hezla Mohamed; Ram Chillar; Ishrat Ali; Sheila Clayton; Dennis Slamon; Jaydutt V Vadgama
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 6.466

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.