Cost-effectiveness of an innovative four-year post-discharge programme for elderly patients--prospective follow-up of hospital and nursing home use in project elderly and randomized controls.

The cost-effectiveness of a post-discharge programme on the use of hospital care and the continuity of care was assessed in an elderly cohort (n = 204) discharged from the city hospital. The participation rate was 97.6%, and the patients were aged 75 years or over and lived alone. The randomized controls (n = 204) received standard aftercare. During the follow-up the costs of university hospital care decreased by 52% in the intervention group and by 24% in the control group per patient year, compared with the costs in the year preceding the project. This happened despite the higher morbidity in the intervention group in terms of fractures and the use of university hospital care in the year preceding the project. There was also a tendency in the intervention group for the previous non-users of university hospital care to remain non-users during the follow-up. The costs of city hospital care increased by 16% and 5%, and of all hospital care by 1.3% and 0.2%, respectively. There were no differences in admissions to permanent care in the nursing homes. The intervention group did not make their first contact with the hospitals or permanent care in nursing homes earlier than the control group during the follow-up. The co-operation between hospital and domiciliary care and voluntary workers was well-suited to the innovative care of the elderly people.

RCT Entities:   Population Interventions Outcomes