Literature DB >> 10817142

Diet selection and animal state: an integrative framework.

I Kyriazakis1, B J Tolkamp, G Emmans.   

Abstract

In the present paper we deal with the problems of explaining and predicting diet selection of animals under controlled conditions, i.e. conditions that can be described and in which any influences of the environment can be either controlled or at least monitored. Diet selection is considered within an integrative framework of feeding behaviour that views both food intake and diet selection as an outcome of the animal's internal state and knowledge of the feeding environment. Three questions that arise from the framework are considered: (1) how do animals learn about foods available to them as a choice? (2) what changes in internal state affect diet selection? (3) how much time is needed for a change in the animal's internal state to be detected and for it to react to this change through a modification of its diet selection? It is proposed that animals have developed behavioural mechanisms that allow them to recognize foods on the basis of their nutritional as well as other properties. The rate at which animals learn about foods depends largely on the extent of the animal's deficiency and on the extent of the post-ingestive consequences induced by the foods. There is little evidence that animals modify their diet selection in response to short-term systemic fluctuation of their internal environment. On the other hand, long-term changes in the internal state of the animal lead to consequent long-term changes in diet selection. The time needed for a change in diet selection to be observed depends on the deviation created in the animal's internal state, either as a result of a physiological change or as a consequence of feeding. Thus, a more appropriate question to consider is not 'what time period matters to the animal?' but 'how much change or deviation in the internal state is the animal prepared to accept?'

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10817142     DOI: 10.1017/s0029665199001044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Nutr Soc        ISSN: 0029-6651            Impact factor:   6.297


  6 in total

1.  The gut microbiome influences host diet selection behavior.

Authors:  Brian K Trevelline; Kevin D Kohl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 12.779

2.  Resource distributions affect social learning on multiple timescales.

Authors:  Daniel J van der Post; Bas Ursem; Paulien Hogeweg
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2009-05-30       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  On the application of mixed hidden Markov models to multiple behavioural time series.

Authors:  S Schliehe-Diecks; P M Kappeler; R Langrock
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 4.  The Combined Application of the Caco-2 Cell Bioassay Coupled with In Vivo (Gallus gallus) Feeding Trial Represents an Effective Approach to Predicting Fe Bioavailability in Humans.

Authors:  Elad Tako; Haim Bar; Raymond P Glahn
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  Domestic cattle (Bos taurus taurus) are motivated to obtain forage and demonstrate contrafreeloading.

Authors:  Jennifer M C Van Os; Erin M Mintline; Trevor J DeVries; Cassandra B Tucker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Moderate heat challenge increased yolk steroid hormones and shaped offspring growth and behavior in chickens.

Authors:  Aline Bertin; Marine Chanson; Joël Delaveau; Frédéric Mercerand; Erich Möstl; Ludovic Calandreau; Cécile Arnould; Christine Leterrier; Anne Collin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.