OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical significance of a molecular assay based on the reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for the presence of micrometastatic melanoma cells in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Routine histologic examination of lymph nodes often underestimates the presence of micrometastatic disease. The authors have previously shown that an RT-PCR assay designed to detect melanocyte-specific expression of the tyrosinase gene could be used to define a population of patients at higher risk for both recurrence and death compared with routine hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) histology. In this study, the authors used the tyrosinase RT-PCR assay in a patient population examined by a more detailed histologic analysis, including S-100 immunohistochemistry. METHODS: Patients underwent lymphatic mapping and SLN biopsy. SLN specimens were bivalved, and half of each specimen was serially sectioned and examined by routine H&E histology and S-100 immunohistochemistry. The other half of each specimen was analyzed by a nested RT-PCR assay. RESULTS: Hematoxylin and eosin histology detected metastatic disease in 36 (16%) of the 233 patients tested. S-100 immunohistochemistry detected micrometastatic disease in another 16 patients, and 114 (63%) of 181 patients with histology-negative nodes had positive findings on RT-PCR. There were significant differences between PCR-positive and PCR-negative patient groups in Breslow thickness, Clark level, and the presence of ulceration of the primary tumor, factors that have been shown to correlate with recurrence and survival. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that RT-PCR can increase the sensitivity of detection of metastatic melanoma cells in SLNs over the current standard methods, including H&E histology and S-100 immunohistochemistry. Further long-term follow-up is needed to detect actual differences in recurrence and overall survival.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical significance of a molecular assay based on the reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for the presence of micrometastatic melanoma cells in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Routine histologic examination of lymph nodes often underestimates the presence of micrometastatic disease. The authors have previously shown that an RT-PCR assay designed to detect melanocyte-specific expression of the tyrosinase gene could be used to define a population of patients at higher risk for both recurrence and death compared with routine hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) histology. In this study, the authors used the tyrosinase RT-PCR assay in a patient population examined by a more detailed histologic analysis, including S-100 immunohistochemistry. METHODS:Patients underwent lymphatic mapping and SLN biopsy. SLN specimens were bivalved, and half of each specimen was serially sectioned and examined by routine H&E histology and S-100 immunohistochemistry. The other half of each specimen was analyzed by a nested RT-PCR assay. RESULTS:Hematoxylin and eosin histology detected metastatic disease in 36 (16%) of the 233 patients tested. S-100 immunohistochemistry detected micrometastatic disease in another 16 patients, and 114 (63%) of 181 patients with histology-negative nodes had positive findings on RT-PCR. There were significant differences between PCR-positive and PCR-negative patient groups in Breslow thickness, Clark level, and the presence of ulceration of the primary tumor, factors that have been shown to correlate with recurrence and survival. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that RT-PCR can increase the sensitivity of detection of metastatic melanoma cells in SLNs over the current standard methods, including H&E histology and S-100 immunohistochemistry. Further long-term follow-up is needed to detect actual differences in recurrence and overall survival.
Authors: C M Balch; S J Soong; A A Bartolucci; M M Urist; C P Karakousis; T J Smith; W J Temple; M I Ross; W R Jewell; M C Mihm; R L Barnhill; H J Wanebo Journal: Ann Surg Date: 1996-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: J E Gershenwald; M I Colome; J E Lee; P F Mansfield; C Tseng; J J Lee; C M Balch; M I Ross Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1998-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: D Reintgen; C W Cruse; K Wells; C Berman; N Fenske; F Glass; K Schroer; R Heller; M Ross; G Lyman Journal: Ann Surg Date: 1994-12 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: X Wang; R Heller; N VanVoorhis; C W Cruse; F Glass; N Fenske; C Berman; J Leo-Messina; D Rappaport; K Wells Journal: Ann Surg Date: 1994-12 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: A Nissan; D Jager; M Roystacher; D Prus; T Peretz; I Eisenberg; H R Freund; M Scanlan; G Ritter; L J Old; S Mitrani-Rosenbaum Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2006-03-13 Impact factor: 7.640