Literature DB >> 10816523

Antibody interactions with the capsule of Cryptococcus neoformans.

M Feldmesser1, J Rivera, Y Kress, T R Kozel, A Casadevall.   

Abstract

Monoclonal antibodies to the encapsulated fungus Cryptococcus neoformans produce different immunofluorescence (IF) patterns after binding to the polysaccharide capsule. To explore the relationship between the IF pattern and the location of antibody binding, two immunoglobulin M (IgM) monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) (12A1 and 13F1) that differ in protective efficacy and IF pattern and one protective IgG1 MAb (2H1) were studied by IF and electron microscopy (EM). Fixing C. neoformans cells in lung tissue for EM resulted in significantly better preservation of the capsule than fixing yeast cells in suspension. The localization of MAbs 12A1 and 13F1 by immunogold EM differed depending on whether the MAb was bound to cells in cut tissue sections embedded in plastic or to cells in solution. In cut tissue sections, MAbs 12A1 and 13F1 bound throughout the capsule, whereas in solution both MAbs bound near the capsule surface. To investigate whether antibody binding to the C. neoformans capsule affected the binding of other primary or secondary reagents, various combinations of MAbs 12A1, 13F1, and 2H1 were studied by direct and indirect IF. The IF pattern and location of binding for MAbs 12A1, 13F1, and 2H1 varied depending on the presence of other capsule-binding MAbs and the method of detection. The results show that (i) binding of MAbs to the C. neoformans polysaccharide capsule can modify the binding of subsequent primary or secondary antibodies; (ii) the IgM MAbs bind primarily to the outer capsule regions despite the occurrence of their epitopes throughout the capsule; and (iii) MAb 2H1 staining of newly formed buds is reduced, suggesting quantitative or qualitative differences in bud capsule.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10816523      PMCID: PMC97654          DOI: 10.1128/IAI.68.6.3642-3650.2000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Immun        ISSN: 0019-9567            Impact factor:   3.441


  37 in total

1.  Antibodies elicited by a Cryptococcus neoformans-tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine have the same specificity as those elicited in infection.

Authors:  A Casadevall; J Mukherjee; S J Devi; R Schneerson; J B Robbins; M D Scharff
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 5.226

2.  A rapid fluorescent assay to distinguish attached from phagocytized yeast particles.

Authors:  S M Levitz; D J DiBenedetto; R D Diamond
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  1987-07-16       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  Opsonization of Cryptococcus neoformans by a family of isotype-switch variant antibodies specific for the capsular polysaccharide.

Authors:  A M Schlageter; T R Kozel
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.441

4.  Ultrastructural study of hepatic granulomas induced by Cryptococcus neoformans by quick-freezing and deep-etching method.

Authors:  N Sakaguchi
Journal:  Virchows Arch B Cell Pathol Incl Mol Pathol       Date:  1993

Review 5.  Polysaccharide antigens of the capsule of Cryptococcus neoformans.

Authors:  R Cherniak; J B Sundstrom
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.441

6.  Ultrastructural study of Cryptococcus neoformans by quick-freezing and deep-etching method.

Authors:  N Sakaguchi; T Baba; M Fukuzawa; S Ohno
Journal:  Mycopathologia       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.574

7.  Regulation of cryptococcal capsular polysaccharide by iron.

Authors:  S E Vartivarian; E J Anaissie; R E Cowart; H A Sprigg; M J Tingler; E S Jacobson
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 5.226

8.  Characterization of Cryptococcus neoformans capsular glucuronoxylomannan polysaccharide with monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  F Todaro-Luck; E Reiss; R Cherniak; L Kaufman
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 3.441

9.  Molecular and idiotypic analysis of antibodies to Cryptococcus neoformans glucuronoxylomannan.

Authors:  A Casadevall; M DeShaw; M Fan; F Dromer; T R Kozel; L A Pirofski
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.441

10.  Molecular characterization of the humoral responses to Cryptococcus neoformans infection and glucuronoxylomannan-tetanus toxoid conjugate immunization.

Authors:  J Mukherjee; A Casadevall; M D Scharff
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1993-04-01       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  23 in total

1.  Methamphetamine Impairs IgG1-Mediated Phagocytosis and Killing of Cryptococcus neoformans by J774.16 Macrophage- and NR-9640 Microglia-Like Cells.

Authors:  Lilit Aslanyan; Hiu H Lee; Vaibhav V Ekhar; Raddy L Ramos; Luis R Martinez
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 3.441

2.  Reduced phagocytosis and killing of Cryptococcus neoformans biofilm-derived cells by J774.16 macrophages is associated with fungal capsular production and surface modification.

Authors:  Hiu Ham Lee; Jaclyn Del Pozzo; Sergio A Salamanca; Hazael Hernandez; Luis R Martinez
Journal:  Fungal Genet Biol       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 3.495

3.  Role of the Apt1 protein in polysaccharide secretion by Cryptococcus neoformans.

Authors:  Juliana Rizzo; Débora L Oliveira; Luna S Joffe; Guanggan Hu; Felipe Gazos-Lopes; Fernanda L Fonseca; Igor C Almeida; Susana Frases; James W Kronstad; Marcio L Rodrigues
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2013-12-13

4.  Dual infections with pigmented and albino strains of Cryptococcus neoformans in patients with or without human immunodeficiency virus infection in India.

Authors:  Piyali Mandal; Uma Banerjee; Arturo Casadevall; Joshua D Nosanchuk
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  An In Vitro Brain Endothelial Model for Studies of Cryptococcal Transmigration into the Central Nervous System.

Authors:  Felipe H Santiago-Tirado; Robyn S Klein; Tamara L Doering
Journal:  Curr Protoc Microbiol       Date:  2019-02-18

6.  Molecular basis for immunoglobulin M specificity to epitopes in Cryptococcus neoformans polysaccharide that elicit protective and nonprotective antibodies.

Authors:  A Nakouzi; P Valadon; J Nosanchuk; N Green; A Casadevall
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.441

7.  Killing of Caenorhabditis elegans by Cryptococcus neoformans as a model of yeast pathogenesis.

Authors:  Eleftherios Mylonakis; Frederick M Ausubel; John R Perfect; Joseph Heitman; Stephen B Calderwood
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Phenotypic switching of Cryptococcus neoformans can produce variants that elicit increased intracranial pressure in a rat model of cryptococcal meningoencephalitis.

Authors:  B C Fries; S C Lee; R Kennan; W Zhao; A Casadevall; D L Goldman
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.441

9.  Challenge of Drosophila melanogaster with Cryptococcus neoformans and role of the innate immune response.

Authors:  Yiorgos Apidianakis; Laurence G Rahme; Joseph Heitman; Frederick M Ausubel; Stephen B Calderwood; Eleftherios Mylonakis
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2004-04

10.  Isolation and characterization of Cryptococcus neoformans spores reveal a critical role for capsule biosynthesis genes in spore biogenesis.

Authors:  Michael R Botts; Steven S Giles; Marcellene A Gates; Thomas R Kozel; Christina M Hull
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2009-01-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.