Literature DB >> 10816399

Assessment of renal artery stenosis: comparison of captopril renography and gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography.

V Bongers1, J Bakker, J J Beutler, F J Beek, J M De Klerk.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine the accuracy of captopril renography (CR) and gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold magnetic resonance (MR) angiography in the diagnosis of 50-99% renal artery stenosis (RAS).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-three patients with possible RAS, of whom 53% had renal function impairment (creatinine >130 micromol/l), were included.(99m)Tc-mercaptoacetyl triglycine (MAG(3)) renography was performed after an oral dose of 25 mg captopril. Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography was performed on a standard 1.5 Tesla system: TR 13.5, TE 3.5, flip angle 60 degrees, matrix 195 x 512. Intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was the standard of reference.
RESULTS: Captropril renography accurately categorized 22 of 26 patients who had either uni- or bilateral RAS of 50-99%. The sensitivity and specificity of CR for the detection of 50-99% stenosis were 85 and 71%, respectively. With MR angiography one occluded artery was incorrectly diagnosed as a stenosis. Sensitivity and specificity were 100 and 94%, respectively. The difference between the accuracies of MR angiography and CR was statistically significant (P = 0.02). The accuracy of CR was lower in patients with renal impairment (70%) than in those with normal renal function (90%).
CONCLUSION: MR angiography showed a high accuracy in diagnosing RAS of between 50 and 99%. CR was less accurate than MR angiography, especially in patients with renal function impairment. In patients with normal renal function, however, CR remains a useful diagnostic test. Copyright 2000 The Royal College of Radiologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10816399     DOI: 10.1053/crad.2000.0435

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  9 in total

Review 1.  Investigating progressive unexplained renal impairment and hypertension.

Authors:  L A Ratnam; S R Nelson; A M Belli
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-11-24

Review 2.  Contemporary imaging techniques for the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis.

Authors:  T Leiner; M W de Haan; P J Nelemans; J M A van Engelshoven; G B C Vasbinder
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-06-28       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Challenges in the diagnosis and management of renal artery stenosis.

Authors:  Moro O Salifu; Dhiren M Haria; Olurotimi Badero; Serhat Aytug; Samy I McFarlane
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.369

4.  Renal artery stenosis: comparative evaluation of gadolinium-enhanced MRA and DSA.

Authors:  F Stacul; S Gava; M Belgrano; S Cernic; L Pagnan; F Pozzi Mucelli; M A Cova
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 5.  The 2008 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for the management of hypertension: Part 1 - blood pressure measurement, diagnosis and assessment of risk.

Authors:  Raj S Padwal; Brenda R Hemmelgarn; Nadia A Khan; Steven Grover; Finlay A McAlister; Donald W McKay; Thomas Wilson; Brian Penner; Ellen Burgess; Peter Bolli; Michael D Hill; Jeff Mahon; Martin G Myers; Carl Abbott; Ernesto L Schiffrin; George Honos; Karen Mann; Guy Tremblay; Alain Milot; Lyne Cloutier; Arun Chockalingam; Simon W Rabkin; Martin Dawes Dawes; Rhian M Touyz; Chaim Bell; Kevin D Burns; Marcel Ruzicka; Norman R C Campbell; Marcel Lebel; Sheldon W Tobe
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.223

6.  The 2007 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for the management of hypertension: part 1- blood pressure measurement, diagnosis and assessment of risk.

Authors:  Raj S Padwal; Brenda R Hemmelgarn; Finlay A McAlister; Donald W McKay; Steven Grover; Thomas Wilson; Brian Penner; Ellen Burgess; Peter Bolli; Michael Hill; Jeff Mahon; Martin G Myers; Carl Abbott; Ernest L Schiffrin; George Honos; Karen Mann; Guy Tremblay; Alain Milot; Lyne Cloutier; Arun Chockalingam; Nadia A Khan; Simon W Rabkin; Martin Dawes; Rhian M Touyz; Sheldon W Tobe
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 7.  The 2009 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for the management of hypertension: Part 1--blood pressure measurement, diagnosis and assessment of risk.

Authors:  Raj S Padwal; Brenda R Hemmelgarn; Nadia A Khan; Steven Grover; Donald W McKay; Thomas Wilson; Brian Penner; Ellen Burgess; Finlay A McAlister; Peter Bolli; Machael D Hill; Jeff Mahon; Martin G Myers; Carl Abbott; Ernesto L Schiffrin; George Honos; Karen Mann; Guy Tremblay; Alain Milot; Lyne Cloutier; Arun Chockalingam; Simon W Rabkin; Martin Dawes; Rhian M Touyz; Chaim Bell; Kevin D Burns; Marcel Ruzicka; Norman R C Campbell; Michel Vallée; Ramesh Prasad; Marcel Lebel; Sheldon W Tobe
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.223

8.  A comparison of low-dose and normal-dose gadobutrol in MR renography and renal angiography.

Authors:  Ilkay Koray Bayrak; Zafer Ozmen; Mehmet Selim Nural; Murat Danaci; Baris Diren
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.500

9.  A comparison of Power Doppler with conventional sonographic imaging for the evaluation of renal artery stenosis.

Authors:  Agatino Manganaro; Giuseppe Ando'; Antonino Salvo; Andrea Consolo; Frank Coppolino; Domenico Giannino
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2004-01-14       Impact factor: 2.062

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.