BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Most traumatic brain injuries are classified as mild, yet in many instances cognitive deficits result. The purpose of this study was to investigate possible relationships between quantitative magnetization transfer imaging (MTI) and neurocognitive findings in a cohort of patients with mild head trauma but negative findings on conventional MR images. METHODS: We examined 13 patients and 10 healthy volunteers with a standard MR protocol including fast spin-echo and gradient-echo imaging, to which was added quantitative MTI. MTI was performed with a modified gradient-echo sequence incorporating pulsed, off-resonance saturation. Both region-of-interest analysis and contour plots were obtained from the MTI data. A subgroup of nine patients was examined with a battery of neuropsychological tests, comprising 25 measures of neurocognitive ability. RESULTS: The magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) in the splenium of the corpus callosum was lower in the patient group as compared with the control group, but no significant reduction in MTR was found in the pons. Individual regional MTR values were significantly reduced in two cases, and contour plot analysis revealed focal areas of abnormality in the splenium of four patients. All the patients showed impairment on at least three measures of the neuropsychological test battery, and in two cases a significant correlation was found between regional MTR values and neuropsychological performance. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that MTI and contour plot analysis may add sensitivity to the MR imaging examination of patients with traumatic brain injury.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Most traumatic brain injuries are classified as mild, yet in many instances cognitive deficits result. The purpose of this study was to investigate possible relationships between quantitative magnetization transfer imaging (MTI) and neurocognitive findings in a cohort of patients with mild head trauma but negative findings on conventional MR images. METHODS: We examined 13 patients and 10 healthy volunteers with a standard MR protocol including fast spin-echo and gradient-echo imaging, to which was added quantitative MTI. MTI was performed with a modified gradient-echo sequence incorporating pulsed, off-resonance saturation. Both region-of-interest analysis and contour plots were obtained from the MTI data. A subgroup of nine patients was examined with a battery of neuropsychological tests, comprising 25 measures of neurocognitive ability. RESULTS: The magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) in the splenium of the corpus callosum was lower in the patient group as compared with the control group, but no significant reduction in MTR was found in the pons. Individual regional MTR values were significantly reduced in two cases, and contour plot analysis revealed focal areas of abnormality in the splenium of four patients. All the patients showed impairment on at least three measures of the neuropsychological test battery, and in two cases a significant correlation was found between regional MTR values and neuropsychological performance. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that MTI and contour plot analysis may add sensitivity to the MR imaging examination of patients with traumatic brain injury.
Authors: J M Gomori; R I Grossman; T Asakura; M D Schnall; S Atlas; G Holland; R L Mittl Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 1993 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: H Kimura; D F Meaney; J C McGowan; R I Grossman; R E Lenkinski; D T Ross; T K McIntosh; T A Gennarelli; D H Smith Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 1996 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: V Dousset; R I Grossman; K N Ramer; M D Schnall; L H Young; F Gonzalez-Scarano; E Lavi; J A Cohen Journal: Radiology Date: 1992-02 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: J F Hiehle; R E Lenkinski; R I Grossman; V Dousset; K N Ramer; M D Schnall; J A Cohen; F Gonzalez-Scarano Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 1994-09 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: M A van Buchem; R I Grossman; C Armstrong; M Polansky; Y Miki; F H Heyning; M P Boncoeur-Martel; L Wei; J K Udupa; M Grossman; D L Kolson; J C McGowan Journal: Neurology Date: 1998-06 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Elisabeth A Wilde; Sylvain Bouix; David F Tate; Alexander P Lin; Mary R Newsome; Brian A Taylor; James R Stone; James Montier; Samuel E Gandy; Brian Biekman; Martha E Shenton; Gerald York Journal: Brain Imaging Behav Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 3.978
Authors: G Sinson; L J Bagley; K M Cecil; M Torchia; J C McGowan; R E Lenkinski; T K McIntosh; R I Grossman Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: P A Hofman; S Z Stapert; M J van Kroonenburgh; J Jolles; J de Kruijk; J T Wilmink Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Tsang-Wei Tu; Rashida A Williams; Jacob D Lescher; Neekita Jikaria; L Christine Turtzo; Joseph A Frank Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2016-04-18 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: John D MacKenzie; Faez Siddiqi; James S Babb; Linda J Bagley; Lois J Mannon; Grant P Sinson; Robert I Grossman Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Eric C Petrie; Donna J Cross; Vasily L Yarnykh; Todd Richards; Nathalie M Martin; Kathleen Pagulayan; David Hoff; Kim Hart; Cynthia Mayer; Matthew Tarabochia; Murray A Raskind; Satoshi Minoshima; Elaine R Peskind Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2014-03-01 Impact factor: 5.269