Literature DB >> 10815363

Factors influencing health insurers' decisions to cover new genetic technologies.

M M Schoonmaker1, B A Bernhardt, N A Holtzman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relative importance of factors influencing health insurers' coverage of new genetic technologies.
METHODS: A national survey in which the decision makers for private health insurers were asked whether they would cover cystic fibrosis (CF) carrier screening, testing for genetic susceptibility to breast cancer (BRCA test), and medical costs of a clinical trial of gene therapy for CF under a variety of conditions.
RESULTS: Respondents' coverage of the two tests and of medical costs of clinical trials was low at the time of the study (4%-15.5% of insurers). Their coverage of CF carrier screening and BRCA testing would be increased significantly if the group tested was restricted to those at high risk, if detection rates were higher and costs lower, and if testing was endorsed by a national professional group or consensus conference. Coverage of the medical costs of a trial of CF gene therapy would be significantly more likely if the trial was restricted to children or adults with severe CF, safety and effectiveness was proven, and therapy could be administered in a regional hospital or an outpatient setting rather than in a research hospital.
CONCLUSIONS: Health insurers play a critical role in the diffusion of new genetic technologies. The validity of genetic tests and the safety and effectiveness of new therapies are primary factors influencing health insurers' coverage. Lower costs and approval of professional groups are other factors associated with increased coverage.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10815363     DOI: 10.1017/s026646230016115x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care        ISSN: 0266-4623            Impact factor:   2.188


  6 in total

Review 1.  Genetics and the individualized prediction of fracture.

Authors:  Tuan V Nguyen; John A Eisman
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.096

2.  Writing Effective Insurance Justification Letters for Cancer Genetic Testing: A Streamlined Approach.

Authors:  H L Shappell; E T Matloff
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Not-so-incidental findings: the ACMG recommendations on the reporting of incidental findings in clinical whole genome and whole exome sequencing.

Authors:  Megan Allyse; Marsha Michie
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 19.536

4.  Eligibility criteria in private and public coverage policies for BRCA genetic testing and genetic counseling.

Authors:  Grace Wang; Mary S Beattie; Ninez A Ponce; Kathryn A Phillips
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 8.822

5.  Impact of gene patents and licensing practices on access to genetic testing for inherited susceptibility to cancer: comparing breast and ovarian cancers with colon cancers.

Authors:  Robert Cook-Deegan; Christopher DeRienzo; Julia Carbone; Subhashini Chandrasekharan; Christopher Heaney; Christopher Conover
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 6.  Insurance, genetic testing and familial cancer: recent policy changes in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  P J Morrison
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  2001-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.