Literature DB >> 10815082

Intravenous ancrod for treatment of acute ischemic stroke: the STAT study: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke Treatment with Ancrod Trial.

D G Sherman1, R P Atkinson, T Chippendale, K A Levin, K Ng, N Futrell, C Y Hsu, D E Levy.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Approved treatment options for acute ischemic stroke in the United States and Canada are limited at present to intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator, but bleeding complications, including intracranial hemorrhage, are a recognized complication.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the defibrinogenating agent ancrod in patients with acute ischemic stroke.
DESIGN: The Stroke Treatment with Ancrod Trial (STAT), a randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted between August 1993 and January 1998.
SETTING: Forty-eight centers, primarily community hospitals, in the United States and Canada. PATIENTS: A total of 500 patients with an acute or progressing ischemic neurological deficit were enrolled and included in the intent-to-treat analysis.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive ancrod (n=248) or placebo (n =252) as a continuous 72-hour intravenous infusion beginning within 3 hours of stroke onset, followed by infusions lasting approximately 1 hour at 96 and 120 hours. The ancrod regimen was designed to decrease plasma fibrinogen levels to 1.18 to 2.03 micromol/L. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary efficacy end point was functional status, with favorable functional status defined as survival to day 90 with a Barthel Index of 95 or more or at least the prestroke value, compared by treatment group. Primary safety variables included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and mortality.
RESULTS: Favorable functional status was achieved by more patients in the ancrod group (42.2%) than in the placebo group (34.4%; P=.04) by the prespecified covariate-adjusted analysis. Mortality was not different between treatment groups (at 90 days, 25.4% for the ancrod group and 23% for the placebo group; P=.62), and the proportion of severely disabled patients was less in the ancrod group than in the placebo group (11.8% vs 19.8%; P=.01). The favorable functional status observed with ancrod vs placebo was consistent in all subgroups defined for age, stroke severity, sex, prestroke disability, and time to treatment (< or = 3 or > 3 hours after stroke onset). There was a trend toward more symptomatic intracranial hemorrhages in the ancrod group vs placebo (5.2% vs 2.0%; P=.06), as well as a significant increase in asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhages (19.0% vs 10.7%; P=.01).
CONCLUSION: In this study, ancrod had a favorable benefit-risk profile for patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10815082     DOI: 10.1001/jama.283.18.2395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  39 in total

Review 1.  Medical management of stroke.

Authors:  K W Muir
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 2.  Choices in medical management for prevention of acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  J D Fleck; J Biller
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 3.  Critical care of acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  R A Bernstein; J C Hemphill
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 4.  Optimal timing of thrombolytic therapy in acute ischaemic stroke.

Authors:  Ken Madden
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 5.  Acute treatment for ischemic stroke in 2004.

Authors:  Yousef M Mohammad; Afshin A Divani; Jawad F Kirmani; Pansy Harris-Lane; Adnan I Qureshi
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2004-12

6.  [Recommendations of the European Stroke Initiative (EUSI) for treatment of ischemic stroke--update 2003. I. organization and acute therapy].

Authors:  Sonja Külkens; Peter Arthur Ringleb; Werner Hacke
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 7.  Why have neuro-protectants failed?: lessons learned from stroke trials.

Authors:  K W Muir; Ph A Teal
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2005-08-25       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 8.  Drug treatment of acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Sameer Bansal; Kiranpal S Sangha; Pooja Khatri
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Drugs       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.571

Review 9.  Can the time window for administration of thrombolytics in stroke be increased?

Authors:  Geoffrey A Donnan; David W Howells; Romesh Markus; Danilo Toni; Stephen M Davis
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.749

10.  Hyperfibrinogenemia and functional outcome from acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Gregory J del Zoppo; David E Levy; Warren W Wasiewski; Arthur M Pancioli; Andrew M Demchuk; James Trammel; Bart M Demaerschalk; Markku Kaste; Gregory W Albers; Eric B Ringelstein
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 7.914

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.