Literature DB >> 10814605

Perception of bronchoconstriction and bronchial hyper-responsiveness in asthma.

R Ottanelli1, E Rosi, I Romagnoli, M C Ronchi, B Lanini, M Grazzini, M Filippelli, L Stendardi, R Duranti, G Scano.   

Abstract

The inter-relationship between the perception of bronchoconstriction, bronchial hyper-responsiveness and temporal adaptation in asthma is still a matter of debate. In a total of 52 stable asthmatic patients, 32 without airway obstruction ¿forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1))/vital capacity (VC) 84.1% (S.D. 7.9%), and 20 with airway obstruction [FEV(1)/VC 60% (4%)], we assessed the perception of bronchoconstriction during methacholine inhalation by using: (i) the slope and intercept of the Borg and VAS (Visual Analog Scale) scores against the decrease in FEV(1), expressed as a percentage of the predicted value; and (ii) the Borg and VAS scores at a 20% decrease in FEV(1) from the lowest post-saline level (PB(20)). Bronchial hyper-responsiveness was assessed as the provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV(1) (PC(20)FEV(1)). The reduction in FEV(1) was significantly related to the Borg and VAS scores, with values for the group mean slope and intercept of this relationship of 0.13 (S.D. 0.08) and -1.1 (3.02) for Borg, and 1.5 (1.19) and -12.01 (35) for VAS. PB(20) was 3 (1.75) with Borg scores and 34.6 (20.5) with VAS scores. Compared with the subgroup without airway obstruction, the obstructed subgroup exhibited similar slopes, but lower Borg and VAS intercepts. For similar decreases in FEV(1) (5-20% decreases from the lowest post-saline values), the Borg and VAS scores were lower in the non-obstructed than in the obstructed subgroup. PC(20)FEV(1) was significantly related to both Borg PB(20) and VAS PB(20) when considering all patients. When assessing the subgroups, PC(20)FEV(1) was related to Borg PB(20) and VAS PB(20) in the non-obstructed subjects, but not in the obstructed subjects. In neither subgroup was the log of the cumulative dose related to the Borg and VAS scores at the end of the test. We conclude that, unlike in previous studies, the ability to perceive acute bronchoconstriction may be reduced as background airflow obstruction increases in asthma. Bronchial hyper-responsiveness did not play a major role in perceived breathlessness in patients without airway obstruction, and even less of a role in patients with obstruction. The cumulative dose of agonist did not appear to influence the perception of bronchoconstriction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10814605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)        ISSN: 0143-5221            Impact factor:   6.124


  7 in total

1.  Does the methacholine test reproduce symptoms?

Authors:  Marianne Lévesque; Heberto Ghezzo; Jocelyne L'Archevêque; Jean-Luc Malo
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.409

2.  Incentive spirometry as a means to score breathlessness.

Authors:  Li-Cher Loh; Pek-Ngor Teh; Sree Raman; Pillai Vijayasingham; Tarmizi Thayaparan
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2005-01

Review 3.  Perception of airway obstruction and airway inflammation in asthma: a review.

Authors:  Elisabetta Rosi; Loredana Stendardi; Barbara Binazzi; Giorgio Scano
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.584

4.  Effects of altered airway function on exercise ventilation in asthmatic adults.

Authors:  Matthew J Rossman; Susan Nader; Dustin Berry; Francesca Orsini; Andrew Klansky; Hans Christian Haverkamp
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 5.  The Perception of Asthma Severity in Children.

Authors:  Lindsay Still; William K Dolen
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.806

6.  Associations of AMP and adenosine induced dyspnea sensation to large and small airways dysfunction in asthma.

Authors:  Claire A Cox; Ilse M Boudewijn; Sebastiaan J Vroegop; Siebrig Schokker; Anne J Lexmond; Henderik W Frijlink; Paul Hagedoorn; Judith M Vonk; Martijn P Farenhorst; Nick H T Ten Hacken; Huib A M Kerstjens; Maarten van den Berge
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 3.317

7.  Cigarette smoking and dyspnea perception.

Authors:  Elisabetta Rosi; Giorgio Scano
Journal:  Tob Induc Dis       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 2.600

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.