V M Tham1, R K Maloney. 1. Jules Stein Eye Institute and the Department of Ophthalmology, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence, types, and outcome of microkeratome complications that occur during laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). DESIGN: Retrospective, noncomparative, case series. PARTICIPANTS: Three thousand nine hundred ninety-eight eyes that underwent primary LASIK by four surgeons between November 1996 and August 1998 at a university-based refractive center. METHODS: All cases with significant microkeratome complications leading to abandonment of the LASIK procedure were identified and reviewed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of complications, change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), change in refractive error, and types of complication. RESULTS: There were 27 complications leading to abandonment of the LASIK procedure of 3998 eyes. The overall rate of microkeratome complication was 1 in 150 (0.68%), but it was 1 in 77 (1.3%) in the surgeons' first 1000 eyes, decreasing to 1 in 250 (0.4%) in the last 1000 eyes. Of the 24 planned bilateral cases, 15 complications (63%) happened on the first operated eye. Twenty-six of 27 eyes (96%) recovered to within one line of preoperative BCVA, and one eye lost two lines. At last examination before any repeat refractive procedures, spherical equivalent manifest refraction returned to within 1 diopter (D) of its preoperative value in 18 of 19 eyes (95%), and astigmatism in 16 of 19 eyes (84%) returned to within 1 D of its preoperative value. Sixteen of 27 eyes (59%) had repeat LASIK. Two eyes had complications at repeat LASIK, one of which led to abandonment of the LASIK procedure for a second time. CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant learning curve in the use of the microkeratome. If ablation is not performed, flap complications rarely lead to significant visual loss and generally do not result in a change in refractive error.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence, types, and outcome of microkeratome complications that occur during laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). DESIGN: Retrospective, noncomparative, case series. PARTICIPANTS: Three thousand nine hundred ninety-eight eyes that underwent primary LASIK by four surgeons between November 1996 and August 1998 at a university-based refractive center. METHODS: All cases with significant microkeratome complications leading to abandonment of the LASIK procedure were identified and reviewed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of complications, change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), change in refractive error, and types of complication. RESULTS: There were 27 complications leading to abandonment of the LASIK procedure of 3998 eyes. The overall rate of microkeratome complication was 1 in 150 (0.68%), but it was 1 in 77 (1.3%) in the surgeons' first 1000 eyes, decreasing to 1 in 250 (0.4%) in the last 1000 eyes. Of the 24 planned bilateral cases, 15 complications (63%) happened on the first operated eye. Twenty-six of 27 eyes (96%) recovered to within one line of preoperative BCVA, and one eye lost two lines. At last examination before any repeat refractive procedures, spherical equivalent manifest refraction returned to within 1 diopter (D) of its preoperative value in 18 of 19 eyes (95%), and astigmatism in 16 of 19 eyes (84%) returned to within 1 D of its preoperative value. Sixteen of 27 eyes (59%) had repeat LASIK. Two eyes had complications at repeat LASIK, one of which led to abandonment of the LASIK procedure for a second time. CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant learning curve in the use of the microkeratome. If ablation is not performed, flap complications rarely lead to significant visual loss and generally do not result in a change in refractive error.
Authors: Yunus Karabela; Orkun Muftuoglu; Ibrahim Gokhan Gulkilik; Mehmet Selim Kocabora; Mustafa Ozsutcu Journal: Int Ophthalmol Date: 2014-02-17 Impact factor: 2.031
Authors: Lorena Romero-Diaz-de-Leon; Juan Carlos Serna-Ojeda; Alejandro Navas; Enrique O Graue-Hernández; Arturo Ramirez-Miranda Journal: J Ophthalmic Vis Res Date: 2016 Jul-Sep