OBJECTIVE: To report on the prevalence, correlates, and natural history of epiretinal membranes (ERM) in eyes with stage II or III/IV macular holes. DESIGN: A subgroup analysis arising from a multicentered, controlled, randomized clinical trial. SETTING:Community and university-based ophthalmology clinics. PATIENTS: Two hundred twenty four eyes with stage II or III/IV macular holes. INTERVENTIONS: No intervention for 100 eyes randomly assigned to observation. OUTCOME MEASURES: Grade of ERM determined by stereoscopic examination of fundus photographs at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months of follow-up. RESULTS: The prevalence of ERM was 65% (145 of 224 eyes), was greater in pseudophakic than in phakic eyes (80% vs. 63%, P = 0.10), and increased with increasing severity of the hole (P < 0.0001). Stage III/IV eyes with ERM had a significantly larger hole size than did eyes without ERM (P < 0.01); however, no association between presence of ERM and visual acuity was found (P > 0.5). In the 100 phakic eyes that were randomly assigned to observation, there was a significant increase in the severity of ERM over follow-up (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS:ERM are common in eyes with full-thickness idiopathic macular holes. Although ERM prevalence increases with severity and size of the macular hole, the presence of ERM are not closely correlated with visual acuity. These factors may be important in considering the removal of ERM during vitrectomy for macular hole.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To report on the prevalence, correlates, and natural history of epiretinal membranes (ERM) in eyes with stage II or III/IV macular holes. DESIGN: A subgroup analysis arising from a multicentered, controlled, randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Community and university-based ophthalmology clinics. PATIENTS: Two hundred twenty four eyes with stage II or III/IV macular holes. INTERVENTIONS: No intervention for 100 eyes randomly assigned to observation. OUTCOME MEASURES: Grade of ERM determined by stereoscopic examination of fundus photographs at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months of follow-up. RESULTS: The prevalence of ERM was 65% (145 of 224 eyes), was greater in pseudophakic than in phakic eyes (80% vs. 63%, P = 0.10), and increased with increasing severity of the hole (P < 0.0001). Stage III/IV eyes with ERM had a significantly larger hole size than did eyes without ERM (P < 0.01); however, no association between presence of ERM and visual acuity was found (P > 0.5). In the 100 phakic eyes that were randomly assigned to observation, there was a significant increase in the severity of ERM over follow-up (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: ERM are common in eyes with full-thickness idiopathic macular holes. Although ERM prevalence increases with severity and size of the macular hole, the presence of ERM are not closely correlated with visual acuity. These factors may be important in considering the removal of ERM during vitrectomy for macular hole.
Authors: Andrea Russo; Marco Ragusa; Cristina Barbagallo; Antonio Longo; Teresio Avitabile; Maurizio G Uva; Vincenza Bonfiglio; Mario D Toro; Rosario Caltabiano; Cesare Mariotti; Francesco Boscia; Mario Romano; Cinzia Di Pietro; Davide Barbagallo; Michele Purrello; Michele Reibaldi Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-03-22 Impact factor: 3.240