INTRODUCTION: Junctional rhythm usually is considered a sensitive but nonspecific marker of successful ablation of the slow pathway in AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. Nevertheless, this junctional rhythm has been little studied, and its relations to recognized predictors of successful radiofrequency (RF) application were never established in any study. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients underwent RF ablation of the slow pathway for AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. Ninety RF applications were delivered, and each ablation site was determined using three different fluoroscopic projections. Six anatomic zones were defined from low posterior septum to the site of distal His-bundle recording (P1, P2, M1, M2, A1, and A2). Characteristics of junctional rhythm during RF applications were analyzed. Atrial electrogram characteristics at the ablation sites also were studied. All patients had successful slow pathway ablation, without any complication. The ablation sites were located as follows: 41 at P1, 26 at P2, 20 at M1, and 3 in M2. Forty RF applications were successful: 14 of 41 attempts at P1, 7 of 26 at P2, 16 of 20 at M1, and 3 of 3 at M2. Mid-septal ablation site (M1 and M2) was associated with higher occurrence of junctional rhythm (P < 0.0001), earlier first junctional beat (P = 0.008), and earlier occurrence of the longest junctional burst (P = 0.03) compared with posterior ablation site (P1 and P2). The combination of a mid-septal ablation site and a first junctional beat occurring < or = 3 seconds after onset of RF application identified successful RF application with 100% accuracy. Using multivariate analysis, the ablation site, duration of atrial electrogram (including slow pathway potential when present), and occurrence of junctional rhythm were independent predictors of success. CONCLUSION: Successful slow pathway ablation depends on many factors. Junctional rhythm characteristics are related to the site of RF delivery and can be helpful in assessing successful slow pathway ablation.
INTRODUCTION: Junctional rhythm usually is considered a sensitive but nonspecific marker of successful ablation of the slow pathway in AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. Nevertheless, this junctional rhythm has been little studied, and its relations to recognized predictors of successful radiofrequency (RF) application were never established in any study. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients underwent RF ablation of the slow pathway for AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. Ninety RF applications were delivered, and each ablation site was determined using three different fluoroscopic projections. Six anatomic zones were defined from low posterior septum to the site of distal His-bundle recording (P1, P2, M1, M2, A1, and A2). Characteristics of junctional rhythm during RF applications were analyzed. Atrial electrogram characteristics at the ablation sites also were studied. All patients had successful slow pathway ablation, without any complication. The ablation sites were located as follows: 41 at P1, 26 at P2, 20 at M1, and 3 in M2. Forty RF applications were successful: 14 of 41 attempts at P1, 7 of 26 at P2, 16 of 20 at M1, and 3 of 3 at M2. Mid-septal ablation site (M1 and M2) was associated with higher occurrence of junctional rhythm (P < 0.0001), earlier first junctional beat (P = 0.008), and earlier occurrence of the longest junctional burst (P = 0.03) compared with posterior ablation site (P1 and P2). The combination of a mid-septal ablation site and a first junctional beat occurring < or = 3 seconds after onset of RF application identified successful RF application with 100% accuracy. Using multivariate analysis, the ablation site, duration of atrial electrogram (including slow pathway potential when present), and occurrence of junctional rhythm were independent predictors of success. CONCLUSION: Successful slow pathway ablation depends on many factors. Junctional rhythm characteristics are related to the site of RF delivery and can be helpful in assessing successful slow pathway ablation.
Authors: Javier Jimenez-Candil; Jose Luis Morinigo; Claudio Ledesma; Victor Leon; Candido Martín-Luengo Journal: Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J Date: 2008-08-01