Literature DB >> 10809453

Age differences in care practices and outcomes for hospitalized patients with cancer.

J H Rose1, E E O'Toole, N V Dawson, C Thomas, A F Connors, N S Wenger, R S Phillips, M B Hamel, H J Cohen, J Lynn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify age group differences in care practices and outcomes for seriously ill hospitalized patients with malignancy.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study (SUPPORT project).
SETTING: Five United States teaching hospitals; data was gathered between 1989 and 1994.
SUBJECTS: Nine hundred twenty five older (age > or = 65 years), 983 middle aged (age = 45-64 years), and 274 younger (age = 18-44 years) hospitalized patients receiving care for non-small cell lung cancer, colon cancer metastasized to the liver, or multi-organ system failure associated with malignancy. MEASUREMENTS: Care practices and patient outcomes were determined from hospital records. Length of survival was identified using the National Death Index. After adjusting for important variables, including severity of illness (i.e., SUPPORT model estimate for 2-month survival, cancer condition), hospital site, selection to intervention and sociodemographic variables, age group differences in care practices and outcomes were identified using general linear models.
RESULTS: Older patients with cancer had lower resource utilization during hospitalization (P < .04) and were less likely to receive cancer-related treatments (i.e., chemotherapy, platelet infusions, scheduled intravenous medications) than middle-aged and young-adult patients in the first week of hospitalization (P < or = .01). More care topics were discussed with older patients and their families then with younger patients and their families (P < .001). Length of stay and total hospital costs were lower for older and middle-aged patients than for younger patients. Although more older patients had discussions about transfer to hospice (P < .001), older patients were no more likely to be discharged with supportive care (inpatient hospice or home with home/ hospice care). Older patients died sooner than middle-aged patients (P < .01).
CONCLUSIONS: Patient age influenced care decisions and outcomes. Older patients (age > or = 65 years) received less aggressive care, had more discussions about care decisions, and died sooner than younger patients with cancer. Younger patients had longer stays, higher hospital costs, and greater probability of rehospitalization. Although well over half of patients died within 6 months of hospitalization, few patients in any age group were discharged with supportive care. Future studies should examine age differences in palliation, as well as acute care of cancer patients across inpatient and ambulatory care settings and should assess quality of care at the end of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10809453     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb03137.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  11 in total

1.  The influence of age on the likelihood of receiving end-of-life care consistent with patient treatment preferences.

Authors:  John D Parr; Baohui Zhang; Matthew E Nilsson; Alexi Wright; Tracy Balboni; Edmund Duthie; Elizabeth Paulk; Holly G Prigerson
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.947

2.  Use of aggressive medical treatments near the end of life: differences between patients with and without dementia.

Authors:  Samuel S Richardson; Greer Sullivan; Ariel Hill; Wei Yu
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Prognostic value of age in neurological cancer: an analysis of 22,393 cases from the SEER database.

Authors:  Minjie Tian; Donglin Zhu; Daowen Chen; Xiaoli Huo; Jianqing Ge; Jie Lu; Li Zhang; Jingping Shi
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-05-27

4.  Cancer patient age and family caregiver bereavement outcomes.

Authors:  Linda E Francis; Georgios Kypriotakis; Elizabeth E O'Toole; Julia Hannum Rose
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 5.  Cancer in the elderly.

Authors:  Nathan A Berger; Panos Savvides; Siran M Koroukian; Eva F Kahana; Gary T Deimling; Julia H Rose; Karen F Bowman; Robert H Miller
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  2006

6.  Complexity of care needs and unstaged cancer in elders: a population-based study.

Authors:  Siran M Koroukian; Fang Xu; Heather Beaird; Mireya Diaz; Patrick Murray; Julia H Rose
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  2007-07-19

7.  Underuse of hospice care by Medicaid-insured patients with stage IV lung cancer in New York and California.

Authors:  Jennifer W Mack; Kun Chen; Francis P Boscoe; Foster C Gesten; Patrick J Roohan; Jane C Weeks; Maria J Schymura; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Attitudes toward early palliative care in cancer patients and caregivers: a Korean nationwide survey.

Authors:  Shin Hye Yoo; Miso Kim; Young Ho Yun; Bhumsuk Keam; Young Ae Kim; Yu Jung Kim; Hyun-Jeong Shim; Eun-Kee Song; Jung Hun Kang; Jung Hye Kwon; Jung Lim Lee; Soon Nam Lee; Si-Young Kim; Eun Joo Kang; Young Rok Do; Yoon Seok Choi; Kyung Hae Jung
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2018-03-25       Impact factor: 4.452

9.  Differences in the symptom experience of older versus younger oncology outpatients: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Janine K Cataldo; Steven Paul; Bruce Cooper; Helen Skerman; Kimberly Alexander; Bradley Aouizerat; Virginia Blackman; John Merriman; Laura Dunn; Christine Ritchie; Patsy Yates; Christine Miaskowski
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 10.  A coping and communication support intervention tailored to older patients diagnosed with late-stage cancer.

Authors:  Julia Hannum Rose; Rosanne Radziewicz; Karen F Bowmans; Elizabeth E O'Toole
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.