Literature DB >> 10809243

Clinical outcomes of immediate full-volume exchange one year after peritoneal catheter implantation for CAPD.

J H Song1, G A Kim, S W Lee, M J Kim.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate actual risk of complications and 1-year catheter survival of immediate full-volume 2000-mL dialysate exchange after peritoneal catheter implantation. DESIGN AND
SETTING: A prospective randomized comparative study in a university hospital kidney center. PATIENTS: The study included 59 end-stage renal disease patients entering into a continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis program between January 1996 and December 1997.
INTERVENTIONS: In group 1 (n = 21), exchange volume was gradually increased from 500 mL per 3 hours to full-volume exchange over 13 days. In group 2 (n = 38), full-volume exchange per 6 hours was performed from the day of catheter implantation. Bed rest with minimal activity was recommended for the first 3 days in both groups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Occurrence of catheter-related complications such as dialysate leakage, drainage failure, malposition, infectious complications, and, ultimately, catheter loss were observed for 1 year.
RESULTS: After straight Tenckhoff catheter implantation, pericatheter dialysate leaks occurred in 9.5% of group 1 and in 10.5% of group 2 patients (no significance, NS). Within 1 month of implantation, the incidences of tunnel or exit-site infection, catheter malposition, and outflow failure were not significantly different between the two groups. Abdominal discomfort was noted in 2 patients from group 2. Peritonitis occurred in 9.5% and 5.3% (NS) within 2 weeks of catheter implantation, and in 14.3% and 10.5% (NS) after more than 2 weeks in group 1 and group 2, respectively. Early catheter loss within 1 month occurred in 4.8% of patients in group 1 and 5.3% in group 2 (NS). The causes of loss were persistent leakage in group 1, and persistent leakage combined with tunnel infection and outflow failure in group 2. The duration of hospitalization from the day of catheter insertion to discharge was definitely shorter in group 2 compared to group 1 (9.9 +/-0.6 days vs 15.0 +/- 0.8 days, p < 0.001). For 1-year follow-up, the frequencies of peritonitis were 0.062 +/- 0.015/patient-month in group 1 and 0.076 +/- 0.018/patient-month in group 2 (NS). The actual 1-year catheter survival was 85.7% in group 1 and 84.2% in group 2 (NS).
CONCLUSIONS: One-year catheter survival after immediate full-volume peritoneal dialysis exchange was 84.2%. This study did not show any evidence that immediate full-volume exchange causes more short- or long-term complications compared to the stepwise volume increment method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10809243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perit Dial Int        ISSN: 0896-8608            Impact factor:   1.756


  11 in total

Review 1.  [Peritoneal dialysis--an ideal initial dialysis mode].

Authors:  Heidi Puttinger
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2013-07-02

2.  Guidelines for laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis access surgery.

Authors:  Stephen Haggerty; Scott Roth; Danielle Walsh; Dimitrios Stefanidis; Raymond Price; Robert D Fanelli; Todd Penner; William Richardson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  The Current State of Peritoneal Dialysis.

Authors:  Rajnish Mehrotra; Olivier Devuyst; Simon J Davies; David W Johnson
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 10.121

4.  Success of Urgent-Start Peritoneal Dialysis in a Large Canadian Renal Program.

Authors:  Ali M A Alkatheeri; Peter G Blake; Daryl Gray; Arsh K Jain
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 5.  How To Build a Successful Urgent-Start Peritoneal Dialysis Program.

Authors:  Nilum Rajora; Shani Shastri; Gulzar Pirwani; Ramesh Saxena
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2020-08-11

6.  Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis versus conventional-start peritoneal dialysis for people with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Htay Htay; David W Johnson; Jonathan C Craig; Armando Teixeira-Pinto; Carmel M Hawley; Yeoungjee Cho
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-12-15

7.  Comparison of outcomes between emergent-start and planned-start peritoneal dialysis in incident ESRD patients: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Wen-Yi Li; Yi-Cheng Wang; Shang-Jyh Hwang; Shih-Hua Lin; Kwan-Dun Wu; Yung-Ming Chen
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 2.388

8.  Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis for patients with end stage renal disease: a 10-year retrospective study.

Authors:  Hongjian Ye; Xiao Yang; Chunyan Yi; Qunying Guo; Yafang Li; Qiongqiong Yang; Wei Chen; Haiping Mao; Jianbo Li; Yagui Qiu; Xunhua Zheng; Dihua Zhang; Jianxiong Lin; Zhijian Li; Zongpei Jiang; Fengxian Huang; Xueqing Yu
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 2.388

9.  Barriers to Peritoneal Dialysis in Saskatchewan Canada: Results From a Province-Wide Survey.

Authors:  Bhanu Prasad; Maryam Jafari; Sachin Shah; Connie McNaught; Lucas Diebel
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2020-12-16

10.  Truly Urgent "Urgent-Start" Peritoneal Dialysis.

Authors:  Michael Chiu; Arsh K Jain; Peter G Blake
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2020-09-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.