Literature DB >> 10809042

Impact of evidence-based "clinical judgment" on the number of American adults requiring lipid-lowering therapy based on updated NHANES III data. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

T A Jacobson1, G G Griffiths, C Varas, D Gause, J C Sung, C M Ballantyne.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: When the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel II (ATP II) guidelines were published, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III data for 1988 to 1991 were used to estimate the number of Americans requiring lipid-lowering therapy based on ATP II cut points. However, the guidelines recommend using clinical judgment to determine whether to initiate drug therapy in individuals whose low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels remain above treatment goals with diet therapy but below the initiation level for drug therapy.
METHODS: We analyzed updated (1988-1994) National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III data, based on a sample of 6796 adults aged 20 years and older, to estimate the numbers of American adults with an elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level and requiring drug therapy using cut points vs clinical judgment as specified in ATP II guidelines.
RESULTS: Assuming a 10% low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction with diet, an estimated 10.4 million American adults require drug therapy based on ATP II cut points. If we include individuals for whom the guidelines recommend clinical judgment, the estimate increases to 28.4 million. The largest increase occurs in individuals without known coronary heart disease but with 2 or more risk factors: from 5.5 to 17.5 million. These high-risk individuals have low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations similar to those in patients with coronary heart disease.
CONCLUSIONS: Since the ATP II guidelines were published, clinical judgment has been informed by abundant clinical trial evidence establishing the safety and benefit of lipid-lowering therapy. The large number of individuals at high risk for coronary heart disease emphasizes the need for cost-effective therapy to extend treatment to the greatest number of individuals who may benefit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10809042     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.160.9.1361

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  12 in total

Review 1.  Newer HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (statin) therapies.

Authors:  E A Brinton
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.882

2.  Squalene synthase inhibitor lapaquistat acetate: could anything be better than statins?

Authors:  James K Liao
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  In-hospital initiation of statin therapy in patients with acute coronary events.

Authors:  Gregg C Fonarow
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.113

4.  C-reactive protein for the prediction of cardiovascular risk: ready for prime-time?

Authors:  Daniel G Hackam; Steven L Shumak
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-05-11       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Treating mixed dyslipidemias: why and how.

Authors:  C M Ballantyne
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.882

6.  The break-even point: when medical advances are less important than improving the fidelity with which they are delivered.

Authors:  Steven H Woolf; Robert E Johnson
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 7.  Statin therapy after acute myocardial infarction: are we adequately treating high-risk patients?

Authors:  Gregg C Fonarow
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 8.  The "New Deadly Quartet" for cardiovascular disease in the 21st century: obesity, metabolic syndrome, inflammation and climate change: how does statin therapy fit into this equation?

Authors:  Michael Clearfield; Melissa Pearce; Yasmin Nibbe; David Crotty; Alesia Wagner
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 9.  Therapy to reduce risk of coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Daniel J Rader
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.882

10.  Lipids, lipoproteins and the risk of benign prostatic hyperplasia in community-dwelling men.

Authors:  J Kellogg Parsons; Jaclyn Bergstrom; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 5.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.