Literature DB >> 10807564

Dose-response analyses of the carcinogenic effects of trichloroethylene in experimental animals.

L R Rhomberg1.   

Abstract

In lifetime bioassays, trichloroethylene (TCE, CAS No. 79-01-6) causes liver tumors in mice following gavage, liver and lung tumors in mice following inhalation, and kidney tumors in rats following gavage or inhalation. Recently developed pharmacokinetic models provide estimates of internal, target-organ doses of the TCE metabolites thought responsible for these tumor responses. Dose-response analyses following recently proposed methods for carcinogen risk assessment from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) are conducted on the animal tumor data using the pharmacokinetic dosimeters to derive a series of alternative projections of the potential carcinogenic potency of TCE in humans exposed to low environmental concentrations. Although mechanistic considerations suggest action of possibly nonlinear processes, dose-response shapes in the observable range of tumor incidence evince little sign of such patterns. Results depend on which of several alternative pharmacokinetic analyses are used to define target-organ doses. Human potency projections under the U.S. EPA linear method based on mouse liver tumors and internal dosimetry equal or somewhat exceed calculations based on administered dose, and projections based on mouse liver tumors exceed those from mouse lung or rat kidney tumors. Estimates of the carcinogenic potency of the two primary oxidative metabolites of TCE--trichloroacetic acid and dichloroacetic acid, which are mouse liver carcinogens in their own right--are also made, but it is not clear whether the carcinogenic potency of TCE can be quantitatively ascribed to metabolic generation of these metabolites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10807564      PMCID: PMC1637760          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.00108s2343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  30 in total

1.  Inhalation carcinogenicity of trichloroethylene in mice and rats.

Authors:  K Fukuda; K Takemoto; H Tsuruta
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.179

2.  A comparison of statistical methods for low dose extrapolation utilizing time-to-tumor data.

Authors:  D Krewski; K S Crump; J Farmer; D W Gaylor; R Howe; C Portier; D Salsburg; R L Sielken; J Van Ryzin
Journal:  Fundam Appl Toxicol       Date:  1983 May-Jun

3.  The carcinogenicity of trichloroethylene and its metabolites, trichloroacetic acid and dichloroacetic acid, in mouse liver.

Authors:  S L Herren-Freund; M A Pereira; M D Khoury; G Olson
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  1987-09-15       Impact factor: 4.219

4.  Carcinogenicity study of trichloroethylene by longterm inhalation in three animal species.

Authors:  D Henschler; W Romen; H M Elsässer; D Reichert; E Eder; Z Radwan
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 5.153

5.  Physiologically based pharmacokinetics and the risk assessment process for methylene chloride.

Authors:  M E Andersen; H J Clewell; M L Gargas; F A Smith; R H Reitz
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 4.219

6.  Man versus beast: pharmacokinetic scaling in mammals.

Authors:  J Mordenti
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 3.534

7.  Long-term carcinogenicity bioassays on trichloroethylene administered by inhalation to Sprague-Dawley rats and Swiss and B6C3F1 mice.

Authors:  C Maltoni; G Lefemine; G Cotti; G Perino
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Statistical analysis of Fisher et al. PBPK model of trichloroethylene kinetics.

Authors:  F Y Bois
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 9.  Development of a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model of trichloroethylene and its metabolites for use in risk assessment.

Authors:  H J Clewell; P R Gentry; T R Covington; J M Gearhart
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  Evaluating noncancer effects of trichloroethylene: dosimetry, mode of action, and risk assessment.

Authors:  H A Barton; H J Clewell
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Remediation of BTEX and trichloroethene. Current knowledge with special emphasis on phytoremediation.

Authors:  Chris Collins; Frank Laturnus; Ales Nepovim
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Trichloroethylene exposure in mid-pregnancy decreased fetal weight and increased placental markers of oxidative stress in rats.

Authors:  Rita Loch-Caruso; Iman Hassan; Sean M Harris; Anjana Kumar; Faith Bjork; Lawrence H Lash
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 3.143

3.  Protein adducts of malondialdehyde and 4-hydroxynonenal contribute to trichloroethene-mediated autoimmunity via activating Th17 cells: dose- and time-response studies in female MRL+/+ mice.

Authors:  Gangduo Wang; Jianling Wang; Xiuzhen Fan; G A S Ansari; M Firoze Khan
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 4.221

Review 4.  Issues in the pharmacokinetics of trichloroethylene and its metabolites.

Authors:  Weihsueh A Chiu; Miles S Okino; John C Lipscomb; Marina V Evans
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Trichloroethylene health risks--state of the science.

Authors:  C S Scott; V J Cogliano
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 6.  A meta-analysis of occupational trichloroethylene exposure and liver cancer.

Authors:  Dominik D Alexander; Michael A Kelsh; Pamela J Mink; Jeffrey H Mandel; Rupa Basu; Michal Weingart
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 2.851

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.