Literature DB >> 10807359

Eosinophilic mucin rhinosinusitis: a distinct clinicopathological entity.

B J Ferguson1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Allergic fungal sinusitis (AFS) was recognized in 1981. Since 1983, a form of sinusitis histologically similar to AFS except for the absence of fungal hyphae has also been noted. The designation "eosinophilic mucin rhinosinusitis (EMRS)" is proposed. Its relationship to AFS is controversial and problematic.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether distinctive clinical and immunological differences exist to differentiate the histological entity of EMRS from AFS. STUDY
DESIGN: Literature review and comparison of cases of AFS (n = 418) to EMRS (n = 40) from the literature, as well as cases of AFS (n = 13) and EMRS (n = 29) accrued in the present study.
RESULTS: A total of 431 AFS patients were compared with 69 EMRS patients. The mean age of patients with AFS was significantly younger than patients with EMRS (30.7 y compared with 48.0 y, respectively; P < .001). Male-to-female ratios were 1.03:1 and 1.26:1 for AFS and EMRS, respectively, and were not significantly different. Forty-one percent of patients with AFS were asthmatic compared with 93% of patients with EMRS (P < .0001). Thirteen percent of patients with AFS were aspirin sensitive compared with 54% of patients with EMRS (P < .0001). Polyp occurrence was almost 100% in both groups. Eighty-four percent of patients with AFS had allergic rhinitis (AR), while only 63% of patients with EMRS had AR (P = .004). Fifty-five percent of AFS patients had bilateral disease, in contrast to the 100% of EMRS patients with bilateral disease (P < .0001). Although average total immunoglobulin E (IgE) was elevated in both groups, it was significantly more elevated in AFS patients (range, 12-13,084 mg/ dL; mean, 1,941 mg/dL) compared with EMRS patients (range, 14-1,162 mg/dL; mean, 267 mg/dL; P < .001). Total immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgG subclasses were seldom reported in the cases available from the literature of either AFS or EMRS. However, in the present series of EMRS, IgG1 deficiency occurred in 50% of evaluated patients (mean, 475 +/- 175 mg/dL; range, 250-869 mg/dL; normal, 422 to 1,200 mg/dL) but in no cases of AFS reported in the literature.
CONCLUSIONS: Significant clinical and immunological differences exist to distinguish AFS from EMRS. It is postulated that AFS is an allergic response to fungi in predisposed individuals, while EMRS occurs because of a systemic dysregulation of immunological controls. Because EMRS is a systemic disease, unilateral disease is not seen. In contrast, AFS, an allergic response to fungi, may occur unilaterally or bilaterally depending on the antigenic stimulation. EMRS also has a significantly higher association with asthma, an increased incidence of aspirin sensitivity, and an increased incidence of IgG1 deficiency. Therapy with a systemic steroid, a potent and indiscriminant anti-inflammatory agent, is a useful adjunct in both disorders. Fungal immunotherapy following surgical extirpation of AFS is useful in preventing AFS recurrence. It is predicted that fungal immunotherapy and antifungal agents will be ineffective in patients with EMRS. It is important to differentiate these two similar histopathological entities in future trials assessing therapeutic efficacy. Inclusion of both entities in a study could obscure recognition of the true effectiveness of intervention, because of the possible variable response differences between the two entities. This study shows that significant clinical and immunological differences exist between EMRS and AFS. The future awaits an exploration of the pathophysiological basis of these differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10807359     DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200005000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  49 in total

1.  Advances in the surgical management of chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Erin D Wright; Saul Frenkiel
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 3.406

Review 2.  Eosinophil ETosis and DNA Traps: a New Look at Eosinophilic Inflammation.

Authors:  Shigeharu Ueki; Takahiro Tokunaga; Shigeharu Fujieda; Kohei Honda; Makoto Hirokawa; Lisa A Spencer; Peter F Weller
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.806

3.  Visual loss secondary to eosinophilic mucin rhinosinusitis in a woman: a case report.

Authors:  Anurag Garg; Raja Das-Bhaumik; Alex D Nesbitt; Adam P Levene; Naresh Joshi; William E Grant; Angus Kennedy
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2010-10-29

Review 4.  Role of fungi in the pathophysiology of chronic rhinosinusitis: an update.

Authors:  Kathleen T Montone
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 5.  Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis and the Unified Airway: the Role of Antifungal Therapy in AFRS.

Authors:  Matthew W Ryan; Christopher M Clark
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.806

6.  A review of the clinicopathological and radiological features of unilateral nasal mass.

Authors:  Satish Nair; E James; S Awasthi; Sapna Nambiar; Sunil Goyal
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-08-27

Review 7.  Rhinosinusitis: Establishing definitions for clinical research and patient care.

Authors:  Eli O Meltzer; Daniel L Hamilos; James A Hadley; Donald C Lanza; Bradley F Marple; Richard A Nicklas; Claus Bachert; James Baraniuk; Fuad M Baroody; Michael S Benninger; Itzhak Brook; Badrul A Chowdhury; Howard M Druce; Stephen Durham; Berrylin Ferguson; Jack M Gwaltney; Michael Kaliner; David W Kennedy; Valerie Lund; Robert Naclerio; Ruby Pawankar; Jay F Piccirillo; Patricia Rohane; Ronald Simon; Raymond G Slavin; Alkis Togias; Ellen R Wald; S James Zinreich
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 8.  Rhinosinusitis: establishing definitions for clinical research and patient care.

Authors:  Eli O Meltzer; Daniel L Hamilos; James A Hadley; Donald C Lanza; Bradley F Marple; Richard A Nicklas; Claus Bachert; James Baraniuk; Fuad M Baroody; Michael S Benninger; Itzhak Brook; Badrul A Chowdhury; Howard M Druce; Stephen Durham; Berrylin Ferguson; Jack M Gwaltney; Michael Kaliner; David W Kennedy; Valerie Lund; Robert Naclerio; Ruby Pawankar; Jay F Piccirillo; Patricia Rohane; Ronald Simon; Raymond G Slavin; Alkis Togias; Ellen R Wald; S James Zinreich
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 10.793

9.  The prevalence of allergic fungal rhinosinusitis in sinonasal polyposis.

Authors:  Mehdi Bakhshaee; Mohammad Fereidouni; Morteza Nourollahian Mohajer; Mohammad Reza Majidi; Farahzad Jabbari Azad; Toktam Moghiman
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Prevalence of allergic fungal sinusitis among patients with nasal polyps.

Authors:  Laila M Telmesani
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.526

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.