D Hasin1, A Paykin, J Meydan, B Grant. 1. Columbia University / New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York 10032, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The clinical and research importance of tolerance and/or withdrawal in the diagnosis of substance dependence has been identified as a key area needing clarification. Earlier longitudinal studies did not identify whether diagnoses of alcohol dependence were current or lifetime. In this study, the prognostic significance of the DSM-IV physiological specifier was investigated among cases of alcohol dependence current at the baseline interview. The role of tremors, required in DSM-III and DSM-III-R, was investigated as well. METHOD: Household residents (N = 130; 57% men) meeting full criteria for current DSM-IV alcohol dependence in a baseline interview were re-interviewed a year later and DSM-IV alcohol dependence was again evaluated. Reliable structured interviews were used to make the diagnoses. The DSM-IV physiologic specifier and its components were tested as predictors of outcome of DSM-IV alcohol dependence, and included an additional definition of alcohol withdrawal that required tremors. Chi-square tests and adjusted odds ratios indicated statistical significance of group differences on outcome. RESULTS: The DSM-IV physiological specifier (tolerance or withdrawal) did not predict 1-year chronicity of DSM-IV alcohol dependence, nor did tolerance when considered separately. However, withdrawal predicted poor outcome (e.g., 1-year chronicity of DSM-IV alcohol dependence). The effect of withdrawal was strengthened when tremors were required as part of the withdrawal syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to earlier longitudinal research, this study supports the prognostic relevance of one component of the present DSM-IV physiological specifier--withdrawal. Withdrawal appears to have stronger prognostic meaning when the DSM-III-R version, in which tremors were required, is used. Further studies of the physiological subtype may benefit from studying subjects who have been clearly identified at the baseline evaluation as having a current diagnosis of dependence.
OBJECTIVE: The clinical and research importance of tolerance and/or withdrawal in the diagnosis of substance dependence has been identified as a key area needing clarification. Earlier longitudinal studies did not identify whether diagnoses of alcohol dependence were current or lifetime. In this study, the prognostic significance of the DSM-IV physiological specifier was investigated among cases of alcohol dependence current at the baseline interview. The role of tremors, required in DSM-III and DSM-III-R, was investigated as well. METHOD: Household residents (N = 130; 57% men) meeting full criteria for current DSM-IV alcohol dependence in a baseline interview were re-interviewed a year later and DSM-IV alcohol dependence was again evaluated. Reliable structured interviews were used to make the diagnoses. The DSM-IV physiologic specifier and its components were tested as predictors of outcome of DSM-IV alcohol dependence, and included an additional definition of alcohol withdrawal that required tremors. Chi-square tests and adjusted odds ratios indicated statistical significance of group differences on outcome. RESULTS: The DSM-IV physiological specifier (tolerance or withdrawal) did not predict 1-year chronicity of DSM-IV alcohol dependence, nor did tolerance when considered separately. However, withdrawal predicted poor outcome (e.g., 1-year chronicity of DSM-IV alcohol dependence). The effect of withdrawal was strengthened when tremors were required as part of the withdrawal syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to earlier longitudinal research, this study supports the prognostic relevance of one component of the present DSM-IV physiological specifier--withdrawal. Withdrawal appears to have stronger prognostic meaning when the DSM-III-R version, in which tremors were required, is used. Further studies of the physiological subtype may benefit from studying subjects who have been clearly identified at the baseline evaluation as having a current diagnosis of dependence.
Authors: Li-Tzy Wu; Jeng-Jong Pan; Dan G Blazer; Betty Tai; Maxine L Stitzer; Robert K Brooner; George E Woody; Ashwin A Patkar; Jack D Blaine Journal: J Stud Alcohol Drugs Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 2.582
Authors: Christopher S Martin; Alvaro Vergés; James W Langenbucher; Andrew Littlefield; Tammy Chung; Duncan B Clark; Kenneth J Sher Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2018-04-16 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Deborah S Hasin; Charles P O'Brien; Marc Auriacombe; Guilherme Borges; Kathleen Bucholz; Alan Budney; Wilson M Compton; Thomas Crowley; Walter Ling; Nancy M Petry; Marc Schuckit; Bridget F Grant Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Cindy L Ehlers; Ian R Gizer; Cassandra Vieten; Kirk C Wilhelmsen Journal: Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet Date: 2010-04-05 Impact factor: 3.568