Literature DB >> 10807141

Implementation of service screening with mammography in Sweden: from pilot study to nationwide programme.

S Olsson1, I Andersson, I Karlberg, N Bjurstam, E Frodis, S Håkansson.   

Abstract

Establishment of mammography screening in Sweden has progressed logically from pilot study through clinical trials to service screening. Screening with mammography for early detection of breast cancer has been provided by all Sweden's 26 county councils since 1997. It took 23 years from the initial pilot study through clinical trials to the establishment of mammography service screening throughout Sweden. In the screening rounds completed by 1995-96, and provided by all but one county council, 1040000 women participated, corresponding to 81% of those invited. The national average recall rate was 2.2%, and consequently 23000 women were recalled for additional investigations. Eleven county councils invited women aged 40-74, six invited women aged 50-69, the remaining eight invited women between both these age intervals. Mammography outside screening programmes-clinical mammography-is available throughout Sweden. About 100000 women a year were referred for clinical mammography and about 50% of these were either younger or older than those invited for screening. A negative relation between the use of clinical mammography and participation in the screening programmes was noticed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10807141     DOI: 10.1136/jms.7.1.14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Screen        ISSN: 0969-1413            Impact factor:   2.136


  24 in total

1.  Epidemiological aspects of cancer screening in Germany.

Authors:  Nikolaus Becker
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-10-14       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Cost of breast cancer in Sweden in 2002.

Authors:  Mathias Lidgren; Nils Wilking; Bengt Jönsson
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2007-03

3.  Breast cancer screening: evidence of benefit depends on the method used.

Authors:  Philippe Autier; Mathieu Boniol
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 8.775

4.  Breast cancer incidence and case fatality among 4.7 million women in relation to social and ethnic background: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Omid Beiki; Per Hall; Anders Ekbom; Tahereh Moradi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 6.466

5.  Breast cancer, sickness absence, income and marital status. A study on life situation 1 year prior diagnosis compared to 3 and 5 years after diagnosis.

Authors:  Sonja Eaker; Annette Wigertz; Paul C Lambert; Leif Bergkvist; Johan Ahlgren; Mats Lambe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Breast cancer mortality in neighbouring European countries with different levels of screening but similar access to treatment: trend analysis of WHO mortality database.

Authors:  Philippe Autier; Mathieu Boniol; Anna Gavin; Lars J Vatten
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-07-28

7.  Impact of a programme of mass mammography screening for breast cancer on socio-economic variation in survival: a population-based study.

Authors:  W J Louwman; L V van de Poll-Franse; J Fracheboud; J A Roukema; J W W Coebergh
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Reducing disparities in mammography-use in a multicultural population in Israel.

Authors:  Orna Baron-Epel; Nurit Friedman; Omri Lernau
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2009-05-19

9.  Age of onset in familial breast cancer as background data for medical surveillance.

Authors:  A Brandt; J Lorenzo Bermejo; J Sundquist; K Hemminki
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Do reproductive factors influence T, N, and M classes of ductal and lobular breast cancers? A nation-wide follow-up study.

Authors:  Seyed Mohsen Mousavi; Asta Försti; Kristina Sundquist; Kari Hemminki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.