Literature DB >> 10806977

Scope and organization of the Guide to Community Preventive Services. The Task Force on Community Preventive Services.

S Zaza1, R S Lawrence, C S Mahan, M Fullilove, D Fleming, G J Isham, M Pappaioanou.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The diverse nature of the target audience (i.e., public health decision-makers) for the Guide to Community Preventive Services: Systematic Reviews and Evidence-Based Recommendations (the Guide) dictates that it must be broad in scope. In addition, for the Guide to be most useful for its target audience, its organization and format must be carefully considered. DETERMINING THE SCOPE OF THE GUIDE: Healthy People objectives and actual causes of death were used to determine the contents of the Guide. A priority setting exercise resulted in the selection of 15 topics for systematic reviews using the following criteria: burden of the problem, preventability, relationship to other public health initiatives, usefulness of the package of topics selected and level of current research and intervention activity in public and private sectors. Interventions within each topic target state and local levels and include population-based strategies, individual strategies in other than clinical settings and group strategies. ORGANIZATION OF THE GUIDE: The Guide is organized into: Introduction, Reviews and Recommendations (three sections: Changing Risk Behaviors, Reducing Diseases, Injuries, or Impairments, and Addressing Environmental and Ecosystem Challenges), Appendixes, and Indexes. DISCUSSION: The scope and organization of the Guide were determined using relevant public health criteria and expert opinion to provide a useful and accessible document to a broad target audience. While the final contents of the Guide may change during development, the working table of contents described in this paper provides a framework for development of the Guide and conveys its scope and intention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10806977     DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(99)00123-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  7 in total

1.  Why don't we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition.

Authors:  Russell E Glasgow; Edward Lichtenstein; Alfred C Marcus
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Public health systems and services research: bridging the practice-research gap.

Authors:  F Douglas Scutchfield; Cynthia D Lamberth
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Value of a small control group for estimating intervention effectiveness: results from simulations of immunization effectiveness studies.

Authors:  Sonja S Hutchins; Cedric Brown; Robert Mayberry; William Sollecito
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 1.744

4.  12-Month Evaluation of an EHR-Supported Staff Role Change for Provision of Tobacco Cessation Care in 8 Primary Care Safety-Net Clinics.

Authors:  Susan A Flocke; Eileen Seeholzer; Steven A Lewis; India J Gill; Jeanmarie C Rose; Elizabeth Albert; Thomas E Love; David Kaelber
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Using evidence-based community and behavioral interventions to prevent skin cancer: opportunities and challenges for public health practice.

Authors:  Karen Glanz; Mona Saraiya
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 2.830

6.  Aligning the Work of Two U.S. Task Forces on Behavioral Counseling Recommendations.

Authors:  David C Grossman; Randy W Elder
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 7.  Reducing ultraviolet radiation exposure among outdoor workers: state of the evidence and recommendations.

Authors:  Karen Glanz; David B Buller; Mona Saraiya
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 5.984

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.