| Literature DB >> 10805814 |
S Nundy1, B Lotto, D Coppola, A Shimpi, D Purves.
Abstract
Although it has long been apparent that observers tend to overestimate the magnitude of acute angles and underestimate obtuse ones, there is no consensus about why such distortions are seen. Geometrical modeling combined with psychophysical testing of human subjects indicates that these misperceptions are the result of an empirical strategy that resolves the inherent ambiguity of angular stimuli by generating percepts of the past significance of the stimulus rather than the geometry of its retinal projection.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2000 PMID: 10805814 PMCID: PMC25873 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.97.10.5592
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205