Literature DB >> 10805814

Why are angles misperceived?

S Nundy1, B Lotto, D Coppola, A Shimpi, D Purves.   

Abstract

Although it has long been apparent that observers tend to overestimate the magnitude of acute angles and underestimate obtuse ones, there is no consensus about why such distortions are seen. Geometrical modeling combined with psychophysical testing of human subjects indicates that these misperceptions are the result of an empirical strategy that resolves the inherent ambiguity of angular stimuli by generating percepts of the past significance of the stimulus rather than the geometry of its retinal projection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10805814      PMCID: PMC25873          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.97.10.5592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  19 in total

1.  The effects of color on brightness.

Authors:  R B Lotto; D Purves
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Mach bands as empirically derived associations.

Authors:  R B Lotto; S M Williams; D Purves
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-04-27       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  DISTORTION OF VISUAL SPACE AS INAPPROPRIATE CONSTANCY SCALING.

Authors:  R L GREGORY
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1963-08-17       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  A comparison of visual tilt illusions measured by the techniques of verticle setting, parallel matching, and dot alignment.

Authors:  P Wenderoth; A Parkinson; D White
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Interactions between orientations in human vision.

Authors:  R H Carpenter; C Blakemore
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1973-10-26       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Perceived orientation of isolated line segments.

Authors:  H Bouma; J J Andriessen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Perception of contour orientation in the central fovea. I: short lines.

Authors:  D P Andrews
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Illusion of length in acute- and obtuse-angle figures.

Authors:  J Predebon
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1994-02

9.  Orientation-selective inhibition from beyond the classic visual receptive field.

Authors:  J I Nelson; B J Frost
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1978-01-13       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Expanding angles? Systematic distortions of space involving angular figures.

Authors:  S Heywood; K Chessell
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  6 in total

1.  An empirical explanation of color contrast.

Authors:  R B Lotto; D Purves
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Natural-scene geometry predicts the perception of angles and line orientation.

Authors:  Catherine Q Howe; Dale Purves
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-18       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Fundamental failures of shape constancy resulting from cortical anisotropy.

Authors:  Elias H Cohen; Qasim Zaidi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Visuomotor mental rotation: the reaction time advantage for anti-pointing is not influenced by perceptual experience with the cardinal axes.

Authors:  Kristina A Neely; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Contextual effects of scene on the visual perception of object orientation in depth.

Authors:  Ryosuke Niimi; Katsumi Watanabe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Spatial warping by oriented line detectors can counteract neural delays.

Authors:  Don A Vaughn; David M Eagleman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-11-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.