Literature DB >> 10805643

Competition and the Effect of Spatial Resource Heterogeneity on Evolutionary Diversification.

Brian Gaylord, Steven D Gaines.   

Abstract

A model is presented to explore how the form of selection arising from competition for resources is affected by spatial resource heterogeneity. The model consists of a single species occupying two patches connected by migration, where the two patches can differ in the type of resources that they contain. The main goal is to determine the conditions under which competition for resources results in disruptive selection (i.e., selection favoring a polymorphism) since it is this form of selection that will give rise to the evolutionary diversification of resource exploitation strategies. In particular, comparing the conditions giving rise to disruptive selection when the two patches are identical to the conditions when they contain different resources reveals the effect of spatial resource heterogeneity. Results show that when the patches are identical, the conditions giving rise to disruptive selection are identical to those that give rise to character displacement in previous models. When the patches are different, the conditions giving rise to disruptive selection can be either more or less stringent depending upon demographic parameters such as the intrinsic rate of increase and the migration rate. Surprisingly, spatial resource heterogeneity can actually make forms of evolutionary diversification such as character displacement less likely. It is also found that results are dependent on how the resource exploitation strategies and the spatial resource heterogeneity affect the population dynamics. One robust conclusion however, is that spatial resource heterogeneity always has a disruptive effect when the migration rate between patches is low.

Keywords:  Lotka‐Volterra; character displacement; competition; density‐dependent selection; frequency‐dependent selection; resource exploitation

Year:  2000        PMID: 10805643     DOI: 10.1086/303357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  33 in total

1.  The combination of selection and dispersal helps explain genetic structure in intertidal mussels.

Authors:  G I Zardi; K R Nicastro; C D McQuaid; L Hancke; B Helmuth
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Coupled biophysical global ocean model and molecular genetic analyses identify multiple introductions of cryptogenic species.

Authors:  Michael N Dawson; Alex Sen Gupta; Matthew H England
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Life at the edge: an experimental study of a poleward range boundary.

Authors:  Sarah E Gilman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-02-14       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 4.  Geographic range limits: achieving synthesis.

Authors:  Kevin J Gaston
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  A macroevolutionary perspective on species range limits.

Authors:  Kaustuv Roy; Gene Hunt; David Jablonski; Andrew Z Krug; James W Valentine
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Sea-level driven glacial-age refugia and post-glacial mixing on subtropical coasts, a palaeohabitat and genetic study.

Authors:  Greer A Dolby; Ryan Hechinger; Ryan A Ellingson; Lloyd T Findley; Julio Lorda; David K Jacobs
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Ocean currents and herbivory drive macroalgae-to-coral community shift under climate warming.

Authors:  Naoki H Kumagai; Jorge García Molinos; Hiroya Yamano; Shintaro Takao; Masahiko Fujii; Yasuhiro Yamanaka
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Global environmental predictors of benthic marine biogeographic structure.

Authors:  Christina L Belanger; David Jablonski; Kaustuv Roy; Sarah K Berke; Andrew Z Krug; James W Valentine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Does fish larval dispersal differ between high and low latitudes?

Authors:  Jeffrey M Leis; Jennifer E Caselle; Ian R Bradbury; Trond Kristiansen; Joel K Llopiz; Michael J Miller; Mary I O'Connor; Claire B Paris; Alan L Shanks; Susan M Sogard; Stephen E Swearer; Eric A Treml; Russell D Vetter; Robert R Warner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Evidence for cohesive dispersal in the sea.

Authors:  Ofer Ben-Tzvi; Avigdor Abelson; Steven D Gaines; Giacomo Bernardi; Ricardo Beldade; Michael S Sheehy; Georges L Paradis; Moshe Kiflawi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.