Literature DB >> 10804327

Cost-effectiveness modeling of Dermagraft for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers in the french context.

B Allenet1, F Parée, T Lebrun, L Carr, J Posnett, J Martini, C Yvon.   

Abstract

To assess the cost-effectiveness of Dermagraft(R) (human dermal replacement) in the treatment of the diabetic foot ulcer, compared to standard treatment. A Markov model was developed, to simulate, over a 52-week period, the health status of a cohort of 100 patients with a diabetic foot ulcer treated either with conventional therapy or with Dermagraft(R). The considered health states were: healed, same site recurrence, unhealed not infected, cellulitis, osteomyelitis, amputation and death. Each week, the patient may progress among states according to a set of transition probabilities directly derived from the original clinical trial conducted in the USA. The cost of each health state was estimated by a Delphi panel of French diabetologists (direct costs only, valuated from a societal perspective). A sensitivity analysis was performed. The total number of healed ulcers included first ulcers healed (76.38% for Dermagraft(R) vs. 69.35% for standard treatment; median time to heal is 14-15 weeks for Dermagraft(R) compared with 28-29 weeks for standard treatment) plus recurrences which are subsequently healed within the 52-week period (14.29 for Dermagraft(R) vs. 25.09 for standard treatment; median time to heal is 3-4 weeks for Dermagraft(R) compared with 5-6 weeks for standard treatment). The average expected cost per treated patient (C/E) using standard treatment for the considered 52-week period is 47,418 FF vs. 54,384 FF for Dermagraft(R) (including 18,200 FF for Dermagraft(R) acquisition and 36,184 FF for standard treatment). Because Dermagraft(R) heals more ulcers within 52 weeks, the average cost per healed ulcer is lower (53,522 FF vs. 56,687 FF for standard treatment). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of Dermagraft(R) (DeltaC/DeltaE) equals 38,784 FF, indicating the extra investment that the decision-maker has to accept for an additional ulcer healed with Dermagraft(R) compared with conventional treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10804327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Metab        ISSN: 1262-3636            Impact factor:   6.041


  8 in total

1.  The cost effectiveness of Apligraf treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.

Authors:  W Ken Redekop; Joseph McDonnell; Paul Verboom; Kornelia Lovas; Zoltan Kalo
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Systematic review of economic evaluations of human cell-derived wound care products for the treatment of venous leg and diabetic foot ulcers.

Authors:  Astrid Langer; Wolf Rogowski
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Tissue engineered skin for diabetic foot ulcers: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xuedong Li; Geliang Xu; Jianqiu Chen
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-10-15

Review 4.  Management and prevention of diabetic foot ulcers and infections: a health economic review.

Authors:  Ivy Chow; Elkin V Lemos; Thomas R Einarson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Diabetic foot ulcer management in clinical practice in the UK: costs and outcomes.

Authors:  Julian F Guest; Graham W Fuller; Peter Vowden
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 6.  A systematic review of cost-effectiveness analyses of complex wound interventions reveals optimal treatments for specific wound types.

Authors:  Andrea C Tricco; Elise Cogo; Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai; Paul A Khan; Geetha Sanmugalingham; Jesmin Antony; Jeffrey S Hoch; Sharon E Straus
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 8.775

7.  Skin Substitutes for Adults With Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Venous Leg Ulcers: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2021-06-04

8.  Cost-effectiveness of clostridial collagenase ointment on wound closure in patients with diabetic foot ulcers: economic analysis of results from a multicenter, randomized, open-label trial.

Authors:  Travis A Motley; Adrienne M Gilligan; Darrell L Lange; Curtis R Waycaster; Jaime E Dickerson
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 2.303

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.