Literature DB >> 10804167

Crustacean (malacostracan) Hox genes and the evolution of the arthropod trunk.

A Abzhanov1, T C Kaufman.   

Abstract

Representatives of the Insecta and the Malacostraca (higher crustaceans) have highly derived body plans subdivided into several tagma, groups of segments united by a common function and/or morphology. The tagmatization of segments in the trunk, the part of the body between head and telson, in both lineages is thought to have evolved independently from ancestors with a distinct head but a homonomous, undifferentiated trunk. In the branchiopod crustacean, Artemia franciscana, the trunk Hox genes are expressed in broad overlapping domains suggesting a conserved ancestral state (Averof, M. and Akam, M. (1995) Nature 376, 420-423). In comparison, in insects, the Antennapedia-class genes of the homeotic clusters are more regionally deployed into distinct domains where they serve to control the morphology of the different trunk segments. Thus an originally Artemia-like pattern of homeotic gene expression has apparently been modified in the insect lineage associated with and perhaps facilitating the observed pattern of tagmatization. Since insects are the only arthropods with a derived trunk tagmosis tested to date, we examined the expression patterns of the Hox genes Antp, Ubx and abd-A in the malacostracan crustacean Porcellio scaber (Oniscidae, Isopoda). We found that, unlike the pattern seen in Artemia, these genes are expressed in well-defined discrete domains coinciding with tagmatic boundaries which are distinct from those of the insects. Our observations suggest that, during the independent tagmatization in insects and malacostracan crustaceans, the homologous 'trunk' genes evolved to perform different developmental functions. We also propose that, in each lineage, the changes in Hox gene expression pattern may have been important in trunk tagmatization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10804167     DOI: 10.1242/dev.127.11.2239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Development        ISSN: 0950-1991            Impact factor:   6.868


  14 in total

1.  Surprising flexibility in a conserved Hox transcription factor over 550 million years of evolution.

Authors:  Alison Heffer; Jeffrey W Shultz; Leslie Pick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Probing the evolution of appendage specialization by Hox gene misexpression in an emerging model crustacean.

Authors:  Anastasios Pavlopoulos; Zacharias Kontarakis; Danielle M Liubicich; Julia M Serano; Michael Akam; Nipam H Patel; Michalis Averof
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The ten Hox genes of the millipede Glomeris marginata.

Authors:  Ralf Janssen; Wim G M Damen
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 0.900

4.  Divergent role of the Hox gene Antennapedia in spiders is responsible for the convergent evolution of abdominal limb repression.

Authors:  Sara Khadjeh; Natascha Turetzek; Matthias Pechmann; Evelyn E Schwager; Ernst A Wimmer; Wim G M Damen; Nikola-Michael Prpic
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Silencing of an abdominal Hox gene during early development is correlated with limb development in a crustacean trunk.

Authors:  Cheryl C Hsia; Adam C Paré; Michael Hannon; Matthew Ronshaugen; William McGinnis
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.930

6.  Hox gene duplications correlate with posterior heteronomy in scorpions.

Authors:  Prashant P Sharma; Evelyn E Schwager; Cassandra G Extavour; Ward C Wheeler
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  The embryonic development of the malacostracan crustacean Porcellio scaber (Isopoda, Oniscidea).

Authors:  Carsten Wolff
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 0.900

8.  Differential regulation of symmetry genes and the evolution of floral morphologies.

Authors:  Lena C Hileman; Elena M Kramer; David A Baum
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The Hox genes Ultrabithorax and abdominal-A specify three different types of abdominal appendage in the springtail Orchesella cincta (Collembola).

Authors:  Barbora Konopova; Michael Akam
Journal:  Evodevo       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 2.250

10.  Successive gain of insulator proteins in arthropod evolution.

Authors:  Peter Heger; Rebecca George; Thomas Wiehe
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 3.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.