Literature DB >> 10803807

Comparative study of quality of life between the Chinese and Japanese adolescent populations.

X Wang1, N Matsuda, H Ma, N Shinfuku.   

Abstract

Researchers from Japan, China and Singapore have initiated a collaborative project, with the aim of comparing adolescent quality of life (QOL) internationally. This study presents the primary results of the investigation conducted in Beijing, China, and Kobe, Japan. The 70-item Quality of Life Questionnaire for Adolescents (QOLQA) was developed and evaluated in Japan and China. In total, 1114 Japanese and 613 Chinese junior high school students, aged 12-15 years, completed the questionnaire. Chinese students scored significantly higher than the Japanese students in overall QOL scores and in most domains. For both groups, subjects had highest score in the independence domain and lowest in psychological domain. In terms of overall QOL score, Chinese male students ranked first, followed by Chinese girls, Japanese boys, and Japanese girls. In the Japanese group, a continuing decrease of QOL scores with age was observed without exception, but no such tendency was present in their Chinese counterparts. No parallel relationship was observed between the higher level of economic development and better quality of life. The results also suggest that mental health promotion should be a priority in improving overall quality of life of adolescents both in Japan and China.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10803807     DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1819.2000.00650.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatry Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 1323-1316            Impact factor:   5.188


  7 in total

1.  Validation of WHO QOL-BREF instrument in Indian adolescents.

Authors:  Kasturi Agnihotri; Shally Awasthi; Hem Chandra; Uttam Singh; Savitri Thakur
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  Quality of life profile--adolescent version: assessing the relationship of covariates to scale scores using structural equation modeling.

Authors:  Lynn B Meuleners; Andy H Lee
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Ethnic differences in quality of life in adolescents among Chinese, Malay and Indians in Singapore.

Authors:  Tze Pin Ng; Lionel Chee Chong Lim; Aizhen Jin; N Shinfuku
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Usefulness of the Audit of Diabetes-Dependent Quality-of-Life (ADDQoL) questionnaire in patients with diabetes in a multi-ethnic Asian country.

Authors:  Hwee-Lin Wee; Chee-Eng Tan; Su-Yen Goh; Shu-Chuen Li
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  The Quality of Life and Its Relationship With Systemic Family Dynamics and Mental Health in Senior High School Students From Shaanxi, China.

Authors:  Zhe Yang; Yijiang Shang; Ying Liang; Haiyue Zhang; Yifan Yang; Yue Wang; Lei Shang; Yuhai Zhang
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-03-31

6.  Systematic Review of Conceptual, Age, Measurement and Valuation Considerations for Generic Multidimensional Childhood Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.

Authors:  Joseph Kwon; Louise Freijser; Julie Ratcliffe; Stavros Petrou; Elisabeth Huynh; Martin Howell; Gang Chen; Kamran Khan; Shahd Daher; Nia Roberts; Conrad Harrison; Sarah Smith; Nancy Devlin; Kirsten Howard; Emily Lancsar; Cate Bailey; Jonathan Craig; Kim Dalziel; Alison Hayes; Brendan Mulhern; Germaine Wong
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 4.558

7.  The Ugandan Youth Quality of Life index: assessing the relevance of incorporating perceived importance into the quality of life measure and factors associated with the quality of life among youth in slum areas of Kampala, Uganda.

Authors:  Andre M N Renzaho; Joseph Kihika Kamara; Gilbert Kamanga
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 2.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.