Literature DB >> 10802779

The DYT1 phenotype and guidelines for diagnostic testing.

S B Bressman1, C Sabatti, D Raymond, D de Leon, C Klein, P L Kramer, M F Brin, S Fahn, X Breakefield, L J Ozelius, N J Risch.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop diagnostic testing guidelines for the DYT1 GAG deletion in the Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) and non-Jewish (NJ) primary torsion dystonia (PTD) populations and to determine the range of dystonic features in affected DYT1 deletion carriers.
METHODS: The authors screened 267 individuals with PTD; 170 were clinically ascertained for diagnosis and treatment, 87 were affected family members ascertained for genetic studies, and 10 were clinically and genetically ascertained and included in both groups. We used published primers and PCR amplification across the critical DYT1 region to determine GAG deletion status. Features of dystonia in clinically ascertained (affected) DYT1 GAG deletion carriers and noncarriers were compared to determine a classification scheme that optimized prediction of carriers. The authors assessed the range of clinical features in the genetically ascertained (affected) DYT1 deletion carriers and tested for differences between AJ and NJ patients.
RESULTS: The optimal algorithm for classification of clinically ascertained carriers was disease onset before age 24 years in a limb (misclassification, 16.5%; sensitivity, 95%; specificity, 80%). Although application of this classification scheme provided good separation in the AJ group (sensitivity, 96%; specificity, 88%), as well as in the group overall, it was less specific in discriminating NJ carriers from noncarriers (sensitivity, 94%; specificity, 69%). Using age 26 years as the cut-off and any site at onset gave a sensitivity of 100%, but specificity decreased to 54% (63% in AJ and 43% in NJ). Among genetically ascertained carriers, onset up to age 44 years occurred, although the great majority displayed early limb onset. There were no significant differences between AJ and NJ genetically ascertained carriers, except that a higher proportion of NJ carriers had onset in a leg, rather than an arm, and widespread disease.
CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic DYT1 testing in conjunction with genetic counseling is recommended for patients with PTD with onset before age 26 years, as this single criterion detected 100% of clinically ascertained carriers, with specificities of 43% to 63%. Testing patients with onset after age 26 years also may be warranted in those having an affected relative with early onset, as the only carriers we observed with onset at age 26 or later were genetically ascertained relatives of individuals whose symptoms started before age 26 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10802779     DOI: 10.1212/wnl.54.9.1746

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  78 in total

Review 1.  Dystonia: phenomenology.

Authors:  Mark S LeDoux
Journal:  Parkinsonism Relat Disord       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.891

Review 2.  Genotype-phenotype correlations in THAP1 dystonia: molecular foundations and description of new cases.

Authors:  Mark S LeDoux; Jianfeng Xiao; Monika Rudzińska; Robert W Bastian; Zbigniew K Wszolek; Jay A Van Gerpen; Andreas Puschmann; Dragana Momčilović; Satya R Vemula; Yu Zhao
Journal:  Parkinsonism Relat Disord       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 4.891

Review 3.  Genetic and clinical features of primary torsion dystonia.

Authors:  Laurie J Ozelius; Susan B Bressman
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 5.996

Review 4.  Inherited isolated dystonia: clinical genetics and gene function.

Authors:  William Dauer
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 5.  Meige syndrome: what's in a name?

Authors:  Mark S LeDoux
Journal:  Parkinsonism Relat Disord       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 4.891

6.  TorsinA dysfunction causes persistent neuronal nuclear pore defects.

Authors:  Samuel S Pappas; Chun-Chi Liang; Sumin Kim; CheyAnne O Rivera; William T Dauer
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 6.150

7.  The New Classification System for the Dystonias: Why Was it Needed and How was it Developed?

Authors:  H A Jinnah; Alberto Albanese
Journal:  Mov Disord Clin Pract       Date:  2014-12-01

Review 8.  Genetics of Movement Disorders and the Practicing Clinician; Who and What to Test for?

Authors:  Alessio Di Fonzo; Edoardo Monfrini; Roberto Erro
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 5.081

9.  Familial adolescent-onset scoliosis and later segmental dystonia in an Irish family.

Authors:  Sean O'Riordan; Timothy Lynch; Michael Hutchinson
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Advances in the genetics of primary torsion dystonia.

Authors:  Enza Maria Valente; Alberto Albanese
Journal:  F1000 Biol Rep       Date:  2010-06-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.