Literature DB >> 10802775

Linomide in relapsing and secondary progressive MS: part I: trial design and clinical results. North American Linomide Investigators.

J H Noseworthy1, J S Wolinsky, F D Lublin, J N Whitaker, A Linde, P Gjorstrup, H C Sullivan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether linomide (roquinimex) is better than placebo in slowing the time to confirmed clinical worsening in patients with relapsing-remitting (RR) and secondary progressive (SP) MS.
METHODS: In this 27-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose, phase III trial, 715 patients with active RRMS (n = 90) or SPMS (n = 625) were randomized to receive either linomide (1.0, 2.5, or 7.5 mg orally daily) or placebo. Patients were evaluated at 3-month intervals clinically and with MRI. The planned primary outcome was the time to the development of "confirmed" clinical worsening (increase of >/= 1.0 Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] score for an enrollment EDSS score </= 5.0, or >/= 0.5 point for an enrollment EDSS score of >/= 5.5) not associated with an acute relapse.
RESULTS: The trial was terminated 1 month after it became fully enrolled due to unanticipated serious cardiopulmonary toxicities (pericarditis, pleural effusion, myocardial infarction, and possible pulmonary embolism), pancreatitis, and death. Notable arthralgia, myalgia, bursitis, and facial and peripheral edema were common adverse events. The high dose of linomide (7.5 mg) was not well tolerated. The trial was too brief to determine unequivocal clinical benefits. Trends suggested an unconfirmed early effect on change in EDSS score at 6 months for the medium dose (2.5 mg daily).
CONCLUSION: MS patients may be more prone to develop important linomide treatment-related adverse events than other previously studied patients. However, linomide may be a potentially more toxic drug than was suspected from observations made in smaller studies for other indications. Phase III trials may identify infrequent and important toxicities that may not be anticipated by phase I and II trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10802775     DOI: 10.1212/wnl.54.9.1726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  49 in total

Review 1.  Comparative assessment of immunomodulating therapies for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Omar Khan; Rana Zabad; Christina Caon; Marina Zvartau-Hind; Alexandros Tselis; Robert Lisak
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 2.  Combination therapy in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Mark J Tullman; Fred D Lublin
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 3.  Novel oral agents for multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Jodie M Burton; Paul O'Connor
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.081

4.  Enhancing the ability of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis to serve as a more rigorous model of multiple sclerosis through refinement of the experimental design.

Authors:  Mitchell R Emerson; Ryan J Gallagher; Janet G Marquis; Steven M LeVine
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 0.982

Review 5.  Animal models of multiple sclerosis for the development and validation of novel therapies - potential and limitations.

Authors:  Eilhard Mix; Hans Meyer-Rienecker; Uwe K Zettl
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 6.  Disease-Modifying Treatment in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  John Robert Ciotti; Anne Haney Cross
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2018-04-07       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 7.  Pharmacological Approaches to the Management of Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  A Nandoskar; J Raffel; A S Scalfari; T Friede; R S Nicholas
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of oral therapies for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Jiwon Oh; Paul W O'Connor
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 5.749

9.  Risks vs benefits of glatiramer acetate: a changing perspective as new therapies emerge for multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Kenneth P Johnson
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 2.423

10.  Open-label, clinical phase I studies of tasquinimod in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  O Bratt; M Häggman; G Ahlgren; O Nordle; A Björk; J-E Damber
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.