PURPOSE: The radiation therapy results for patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been disappointing. Tumor dose escalation using concomitant boost technique (CBT) has been shown to improve local control in a few prospective studies. This trial was carried out to prospectively assess the radiation response and acute toxicity of CBT in comparison to the conventional treatment technique (CTT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Ninety-seven consecutive eligible patients were entered in this prospective clinical trial between November 1994 and February 1998. Patients were randomized to receive either CBT (43 patients) or CTT (54 patients) radiation therapy. These patients either refused chemotherapy or were judged as unsuitable for chemotherapy. Patients in the CBT group received 46.8 Gy in 26 fractions using large fields that encompassed the gross and occult disease. A concomitant boost of 18.2 Gy (0.7 Gy per fraction) was delivered to the gross disease using small fields with 1.5-cm margins. The small fields were treated concurrently with the large fields and the total dose to the tumor area was 65 Gy in 26 fractions. Patients in the CTT group received 70.8 Gy in 38 fractions. The acute toxicity between each group was compared. The response rate was analyzed and compared by treatment group, gender, age, stage, histology, initial Karnofsky performance score (KPS), severity of acute toxicity, and maximum body weight loss (MBWL) during treatment course. RESULTS: The demographic parameters such as sex, age, and stage were evenly distributed in each treatment group. The majority of these patients had Stage IIIA and IIIB disease. Overall median treatment times were 39 days for the CBT group of patients and 62 days for the CTT group. No treatment-related mortality was found. There were 2 patients in the CTT group with acute RTOG Grade 3 lung toxicity, and no Grade 3 lung or esophageal toxicity was observed in CBT group. The response rates, assessed by radiographic images, were 69.8% and 48.1% for the CBT and CTT patients, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed that patients in the CBT group, patients with better KPS, and patients with more severe acute toxicity had a higher response rate. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that concomitant boost radiation therapy is tolerable, and produces a superior response rate than conventional radiation therapy for patients with inoperable NSCLC. The length of treatment was reduced from 38 to 26 treatment days, almost a 30% reduction.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: The radiation therapy results for patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been disappointing. Tumor dose escalation using concomitant boost technique (CBT) has been shown to improve local control in a few prospective studies. This trial was carried out to prospectively assess the radiation response and acute toxicity of CBT in comparison to the conventional treatment technique (CTT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Ninety-seven consecutive eligible patients were entered in this prospective clinical trial between November 1994 and February 1998. Patients were randomized to receive either CBT (43 patients) or CTT (54 patients) radiation therapy. These patients either refused chemotherapy or were judged as unsuitable for chemotherapy. Patients in the CBT group received 46.8 Gy in 26 fractions using large fields that encompassed the gross and occult disease. A concomitant boost of 18.2 Gy (0.7 Gy per fraction) was delivered to the gross disease using small fields with 1.5-cm margins. The small fields were treated concurrently with the large fields and the total dose to the tumor area was 65 Gy in 26 fractions. Patients in the CTT group received 70.8 Gy in 38 fractions. The acute toxicity between each group was compared. The response rate was analyzed and compared by treatment group, gender, age, stage, histology, initial Karnofsky performance score (KPS), severity of acute toxicity, and maximum body weight loss (MBWL) during treatment course. RESULTS: The demographic parameters such as sex, age, and stage were evenly distributed in each treatment group. The majority of these patients had Stage IIIA and IIIB disease. Overall median treatment times were 39 days for the CBT group of patients and 62 days for the CTT group. No treatment-related mortality was found. There were 2 patients in the CTT group with acute RTOG Grade 3 lung toxicity, and no Grade 3 lung or esophageal toxicity was observed in CBT group. The response rates, assessed by radiographic images, were 69.8% and 48.1% for the CBT and CTTpatients, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed that patients in the CBT group, patients with better KPS, and patients with more severe acute toxicity had a higher response rate. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that concomitant boost radiation therapy is tolerable, and produces a superior response rate than conventional radiation therapy for patients with inoperable NSCLC. The length of treatment was reduced from 38 to 26 treatment days, almost a 30% reduction.
Authors: D Franceschini; F De Rose; L Cozzi; P Navarria; E Clerici; C Franzese; T Comito; A Tozzi; C Iftode; G D'Agostino; M Sorsetti Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2017-02-06 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Audrey Mauguen; Cécile Le Péchoux; Michele I Saunders; Steven E Schild; Andrew T Turrisi; Michael Baumann; William T Sause; David Ball; Chandra P Belani; James A Bonner; Aleksander Zajusz; Suzanne E Dahlberg; Matthew Nankivell; Sumithra J Mandrekar; Rebecca Paulus; Katarzyna Behrendt; Rainer Koch; James F Bishop; Stanley Dische; Rodrigo Arriagada; Dirk De Ruysscher; Jean-Pierre Pignon Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-07-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jing You; Dan Yang; Dongming Li; Leilei Jiang; Rong Yu; Huiming Yu; Bo Xu; Weihu Wang; Anhui Shi Journal: Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi Date: 2019-11-20